Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
washingtonpost.com
Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
1–10 of 123 posts
Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#2Furthermore others on social media actively encouraged her violence which directly led to her death and serious injury to her children. It reminds me most of the school shooting in Oregon where the attacker was actively encouraged on internet forums to commit the act. Though like in that incident I think this women would have acted the same regardless.
Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#3Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#4This is going to get upvoted because of the title, I really hope that people read the actual article before posting. The worst part is that this women put her children in extreme danger and had a history of instigating police and threatening extreme violence through social media. Furthermore others on social media actively encouraged her violence which directly led to her death and serious injury to her children. It…
Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#5This seems entirely appropriate. It would be consistent with the practice of news outlets sometimes not showing an ongoing police operation live.
Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#6This is going to get upvoted because of the title, I really hope that people read the actual article before posting. The worst part is that this women put her children in extreme danger and had a history of instigating police and threatening extreme violence through social media. Furthermore others on social media actively encouraged her violence which directly led to her death and serious injury to her children. It…
Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#7I wonder what FB's policy on this will be going forward. In many ways, these livestreams are a public good and provide transparency and additional accountability in these situations. If people elect to stream them, it seems wrong to shut it down. On the other hand, perhaps there is a public good in not showing an ongoing live police operation?
I think I'd lean toward not agreeing to shutdown such streams, unless perhaps it's a hostage situation or terror event of some kind. (Getting into squishy definitions there, I'm sure, which is why I qualify it provisionally.)
As to this particular incident... I wish the deceased hadn't resisted. It seems in this case the police exercised much more caution and restraint than has been the case in many other recent examples of shootings. And I think one thing generally stands: if you threaten to kill a police officer and especially if you do so while holding a weapon (or certainly pointing it at them), you're likely to be shot.
Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#8Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#9A mother determined to endanger the life of her son in a firefight with police. Though it seems it may not have been her fault that she turned out that way. Quite sad.
Re: Police had woman’s Facebook deactivated during standoff
#10This seems entirely appropriate. It would be consistent with the practice of news outlets sometimes not showing an ongoing police operation live.
I don't know the background for these policies, so asking the first question non-rhetorically.