Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

bloomberg.com

31–40 of 128 posts

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#31
post #3

>The IRS claims Facebook’s tax adviser Ernst & Young LLP undervalued the company’s property as it was transferred to Facebook Ireland Holdings Ltd. by evaluating pieces of the online platform separately, according to court filings ... “I don’t think Facebook is necessarily hiding anything, but it’s a fight over pricing,” said Stephen Hamilton, a tax lawyer in Philadelphia. “This is what companies do when they transfe…

I'm not sure why you put value in scare quotes. By avoiding excessive US taxes, Facebook is now a more efficient company.

That is how taxes work. The government introduces friction into economic transactions, which sucks up some amount of productivity from those who produce value, which the government can then use for its own ends. By moving to a country with more reasonable taxes, Facebook's economic interactions now have less friction and higher efficiency.

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#32
post #2

How can countries avoid the spiral of death with taxing? I hate how google, facebook etc. makes hundreds of millions in my country, but barely pay taxes. While local companies do.

Companies want to pay no taxes, but they want protection from the legal system infrastructure etc. that allows a company to be successful.

There is so much inefficieny in gov't spending that your statement is meaningless. The biggest line items in the gov't budgets have nothing to do with the legal system or infrastructure.

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#33
post #3

>The IRS claims Facebook’s tax adviser Ernst & Young LLP undervalued the company’s property as it was transferred to Facebook Ireland Holdings Ltd. by evaluating pieces of the online platform separately, according to court filings ... “I don’t think Facebook is necessarily hiding anything, but it’s a fight over pricing,” said Stephen Hamilton, a tax lawyer in Philadelphia. “This is what companies do when they transfe…

E&Y denies yet another country tax income. When are govts going to blacklist these guys from govt contracts?

The UK was supposed to be excluding such companies.

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#34
post #6

I cannot understand the indignation, the system is working exactly as designed- board members have responsibilities to the shareholders to maximise profits, it would be imprudent if they didn't move to reduce tax burden. The miles of column inches written on this topic is being tediuos. Solutions are simple, anyone telling you otherwise are the same people who hold economists in high regard- 1. Reduce your local tax…

Wouldn't #1 result in a race to the bottom? Why wouldn't a foreign country use tax policy to lower their corp rates towards zero in order to attract foreign tax revenue? After all, some tax is better than no tax.

Well, they do that, the trick is doing it in a foreign country that has access to a market that matters. Sure you get zero tax on some island state but what good is that if you then pay prohibitive taxes to buy/sell something to the EU because it becomes foreign trade, for example.

So they use Ireland, where they can get a special deal:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/eu-may-decide-on-apple-tax-probe...

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#35
post #13
post #3

>The IRS claims Facebook’s tax adviser Ernst & Young LLP undervalued the company’s property as it was transferred to Facebook Ireland Holdings Ltd. by evaluating pieces of the online platform separately, according to court filings ... “I don’t think Facebook is necessarily hiding anything, but it’s a fight over pricing,” said Stephen Hamilton, a tax lawyer in Philadelphia. “This is what companies do when they transfe…

Accountants and Lawyers end up doing value addition because government regulations are far too complex.

Accounting and law firms hire lobbyists to persuade the government to make the law more complex. This is value destruction.

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#36
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you think paying taxes is a virtue ? Why does US government need 40% of our hard earned money ? May be American politicians should stop the war on drugs, wars in far off countries and medicare and reduce tax levels to 20%. Facebook, Google, Apple and push the frontiers of human knowledge at rapid rate if they can spend that money themselves. In case of government it will be used to by some junk airforce planes…

Serious question: who pays an effective rate of 40 percent? Many of these huge corporate entities are in the single or negative digits.

That's because they are deferring the taxes on the ex-US money.

It's a 401k in the US. It's a tax deferment, not a tax break. If your effective rate went from 35% to 25% due to your 401k contribution, you still end up paying 35%, just not right now.

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#37
Remember just a couple of days ago all the people praising Facebook over its "profits"? Not paying taxes can get you that.

I just think it's terrible how Facebook wants to have its cake and eat it, too - profit from low European taxes, but transfer all of Europe's data to the U.S. for maximum amount of mining.

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#38
post #31
post #3

>The IRS claims Facebook’s tax adviser Ernst & Young LLP undervalued the company’s property as it was transferred to Facebook Ireland Holdings Ltd. by evaluating pieces of the online platform separately, according to court filings ... “I don’t think Facebook is necessarily hiding anything, but it’s a fight over pricing,” said Stephen Hamilton, a tax lawyer in Philadelphia. “This is what companies do when they transfe…

I'm not sure why you put value in scare quotes. By avoiding excessive US taxes, Facebook is now a more efficient company. That is how taxes work. The government introduces friction into economic transactions, which sucks up some amount of productivity from those who produce value, which the government can then use for its own ends. By moving to a country with more reasonable taxes, Facebook's economic interactions no…

This has nothing to do with taxes or business efficiency. The IRS is saying that Facebook undervalued their assets when transferring them to Ireland. It's the implications of that deal that are being discussed

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#39
post #2

How can countries avoid the spiral of death with taxing? I hate how google, facebook etc. makes hundreds of millions in my country, but barely pay taxes. While local companies do.

They should isolate countries like Ireland who are allowing countries to wash profits through their territory to "allow investment".

Ireland is 5m people. Just hang them out to dry. Either they consume as much as they add in value or their standard of living has to drop until this is held to be correct.

Re: Facebook Tax Bill Over Ireland Move Could Cost $5B

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know of anyone choosing #2, but #1 and #3 are extremely common. The US surprisingly has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the OECD and is one of very very few countries with a worldwide rather than territorial tax system. Those two points taken together are why US tech firms transfer their IP to Ireland in the first place. It's also why so many US companies (at least pre-Brexit) would merge with Europ…

But this whole game is inherently one where some governments will lose. If countries are free to set their own corporate tax rates, you'll get some with high rates and some with lower, and corporations - which can relocate in a way that a state cannot - will just gravitate from the high end to the low end, screwing over those at the high end. That is the problem: we live in a world where business can be global, but o…

will just gravitate from the high end to the low end, screwing over those at the high end

Gov'ts are providing a service. Competition is a good thing.

If one company was charging $1K for a computer and another charging $500k for the exact same thing, would you say consumers are screwing over the first company when they buy from the 2nd company?

Post reply on HN