They loved wikileaks until it went after Hilary. Of course.
Who are "they"?
WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
11–20 of 46 posts
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#12This article doesn't make it clear what was actually leaked. Was it the actual private info or links to it? Was this info already publicly available? Honestly this article seems like retaliation for the earlier DNC leak and is heavy on accusations, light on facts.
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#13This article doesn't make it clear what was actually leaked. Was it the actual private info or links to it? Was this info already publicly available? Honestly this article seems like retaliation for the earlier DNC leak and is heavy on accusations, light on facts.
The DNC leak for example includes lots of social security numbers and credit card numbers. If they cared at all they could have done a search and replace to get most of them.
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#14They loved wikileaks until it went after Hilary. Of course.
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#15"@Sulliview @TheWorldPost Please issue a correction. The story is a fabrication. WikiLeaks did not publish the databases concerned"
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#16Wikileaks statement: "@Sulliview @TheWorldPost Please issue a correction. The story is a fabrication. WikiLeaks did not publish the databases concerned" https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/757940726198042624
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#17"Bloody and brutal coup"... oh the hiperbole.
The brutality seems to have been mostly by Erdogan supporters; though this is probably not what the article was trying to convey...
Anti-coup casualties: 161 civilians and police officers
Pro-coup casualties: 104 military
I'm no fan of Erdogan's "reforms" after the coup, but there's no need to alter the narrative in favour of a preferred agenda.
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#18This article doesn't make it clear what was actually leaked. Was it the actual private info or links to it? Was this info already publicly available? Honestly this article seems like retaliation for the earlier DNC leak and is heavy on accusations, light on facts.
Anyone who has been paying attention knows that WikiLeaks has always been careless about sharing private information that puts ordinary people at risk. The only time they've been somewhat responsible is when they partnered with newspapers who know better. The DNC leak for example includes lots of social security numbers and credit card numbers. If they cared at all they could have done a search and replace to get mos…
Re: WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone who has been paying attention knows that WikiLeaks has always been careless about sharing private information that puts ordinary people at risk. The only time they've been somewhat responsible is when they partnered with newspapers who know better. The DNC leak for example includes lots of social security numbers and credit card numbers. If they cared at all they could have done a search and replace to get mos…
I would rather they didn't manipulate or censor their leaks. I'm sure I'm not alone in that.
We don't yet know if that information will be useful to the world, because we didn't really look at it, but we'd like to have it out in the public record - for completion's sake. I'm sure it'll be valuable to someone.
I realize that you may not be involved in any impropriety, but you may have at one point e-mailed someone who is, or someone who works for someone who is.
No more secrets, right?