Earlier quoted context omitted.
"The plagiarized paragraph shows that the Trump campaign isn't very well organized. I think most knew that." Compared to who? Hillary's #stealthebern campaign or the 2007/8 plagiarism scandals with Obama? Joe Biden has some serious scandals as well. If the media weren't pushing a certain angle, all these scandals would have been kept in context. Instead one line from a politician's wife's speechwriter now means he's…
The line from the speech was just an example that underlined how little staffing Trump has. I think it is pretty widely recognized that his staff isn't experienced, and there are very few of them compared to a usual campaign. If you don't agree, I understand that we are talking partisan politics, so I'm unlikely to convince you. Perhaps consider listening to some political wonk podcasts and you hear how amazed they a…
Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site
161–167 of 167 posts
Re: Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
It requires explanation that a multinational company would support a trade deal?
Good question. Do they support every single trade deal? Do they lobby equitably between them? If not, then why this one?
Re: Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good question. Do they support every single trade deal? Do they lobby equitably between them? If not, then why this one?
Since you're the one making the insinuations/argument, you should be answering those questions for us.
Re: Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site
#164Re: Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site
#165Re: Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site
#166Re: Google tags Wikileaks as a dangerous site
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
"The plagiarized paragraph shows that the Trump campaign isn't very well organized. I think most knew that." Compared to who? Hillary's #stealthebern campaign or the 2007/8 plagiarism scandals with Obama? Joe Biden has some serious scandals as well. If the media weren't pushing a certain angle, all these scandals would have been kept in context. Instead one line from a politician's wife's speechwriter now means he's…
The line from the speech was just an example that underlined how little staffing Trump has. I think it is pretty widely recognized that his staff isn't experienced, and there are very few of them compared to a usual campaign. If you don't agree, I understand that we are talking partisan politics, so I'm unlikely to convince you. Perhaps consider listening to some political wonk podcasts and you hear how amazed they a…
What does this really says about Trump's efficiency compare to Hillary?