Live data from Hacker News

Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

bbc.co.uk

231–240 of 367 posts

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#231

can someone explain why yahoo is worth a penny?

5th most visited web property in the world(source : Similarweb). Mail, Flickr, Tumblr, Finance, Sports , Fantasy sports still used by a lot of users. I think it's a pretty sweet deal for verizon. you don't get a age old web property which everyone know off for this money.

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#232

Yahoo got all cash, which is nice as it gives them more flexibility, the last thing they'd want after the Alibaba spin off fiasco is to have to try and sell 4.83 Billion in Verizon stock. Bloomberg just put up a head line saying that Yahoo will return all the cash, minus Operating Costs to the share holders. If anyone has any guess as to how much "operating costs" will be, please email:) So I guess queue Alibaba and…

I find it hard to parse "not expected to join Verizon" against Mayer's explicit statement that "For me personally, I’m planning to stay. I love Yahoo, and I believe in all of you. It’s important to me to see Yahoo into its next chapter": http://marissamayr.tumblr.com/post/147941613134/verizon-to-a...

She can "plan to stay" all she wants. If she's forced out, then the best-laid plans are for naught.

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#233

Yahoo got all cash, which is nice as it gives them more flexibility, the last thing they'd want after the Alibaba spin off fiasco is to have to try and sell 4.83 Billion in Verizon stock. Bloomberg just put up a head line saying that Yahoo will return all the cash, minus Operating Costs to the share holders. If anyone has any guess as to how much "operating costs" will be, please email:) So I guess queue Alibaba and…

There has been a lot of debate as to whether she succeeded or failed at her job, but at the end of the day all I can say: I really chose the wrong career path, as I can't imagine a scenario where a dev's comparative performance results in a 218m$ payout. (In more direct terms, I would gladly take the internet-hate-firehose in the face if it means making even single digit millions.) To make some more reasonable statem…

Soon-to-be a freshman in college. If you don't mind me asking, what career path do you wish you took?

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You think Dell or HP would ever have sidelined Intel? AMD was going to get shafted, no matter what.

Dell and HP would have sidelined Intel in a heartbeat if they could have made more money by switching to AMD.

The Intel advertising campaign kept their branding quite strong in the consumer market and there'd have been an uphill battle to get consumers onto the AMD train for even Dell and other OEMs. With consoles, the branding isn't the CPUs but the console maker's and the audience generally doesn't include grandma & grandpa that only ever watch TV commercials and see an occasional newspaper advertisement when it comes to technology.

On the business technology side it'd be even harder due to thermal characteristics that have been demanded for over a decade now and Intel destroys AMD there without question.

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#236
post #112
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well to defend them they needed a solution to fight the incoming intel cpu with integrated gpu. They needed ATI portfolio and knowledges.

The integrated GPU really didn't need that kind of power, though. Anyone playing more than solitaire is going to get a discrete GPU anyway. They could have snapped up a smaller chipset maker for a tenth of the price. Instead they entered both the integrated and discrete GPU markets, when they were already a market underdog that already struggled in the CPU market. They paid way too much for ATI, and then spread thems…

Current Intel iGPU, and especially AMD APUs are powerful enough to play all the most popular esports games, despite them being quite a bit more demanding than solitaire.

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#237
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That really had to be the dumbest moves in computing history. "What does the #2 CPU maker need to become #1? The #2 GPU maker, obviously!"

Well NVIDIA wanted to spin off into the CPU market also, they sorta did with them building ARM based SOC's with NVIDIA GPU's. There were also rumors of them licensing x86 from Intel. Oddly enough NVIDIA back in the day made what arguable was the best chipset for AMD CPU's - NVIDIA nForce.

There's also some belief Project Denver was supposed to be an x86 core and could still be turned into one.

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#238
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure, having the GPU division allowed them to bid for the Xbox and PS contracts. Having an APU allows them to play in the low end market which was dominated by Intel with their IGP, the vast majority of laptops do not come with a discrete GPU which meant that AMD could not compete with Intel at all prior to their acquisition of ATI unless they would develop their own GPU or license it from some one (they had plan…

Exactly, there's a reason that Xbox and PlayStation are both using AMD chips. What those systems needed was a lot more GPU power than CPU power, so AMD was well positioned to do that. It's not a massive money maker for them, but I think that it positioned them well to push open standards like FreeSync, and Mantle/Vulcan. AMD is also fighting back by trying to develop open standards, knowing that proprietary ones woul…

>knowing that proprietary ones wouldn't ever get any traction.

Not unless AMD had a dominant market position. CUDA dominating the ecosystem right now is a major PITA, and so is the insistence on GSync over FreeSync.

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There has been a lot of debate as to whether she succeeded or failed at her job, but at the end of the day all I can say: I really chose the wrong career path, as I can't imagine a scenario where a dev's comparative performance results in a 218m$ payout. (In more direct terms, I would gladly take the internet-hate-firehose in the face if it means making even single digit millions.) To make some more reasonable statem…

Soon-to-be a freshman in college. If you don't mind me asking, what career path do you wish you took?

Hahaha. I'm sorry if I was unclear, the statement was _slightly_ tongue in cheek. I'm not sure I could have made it in any field other than dev and I do mostly like that I chose it. Bio-engineering maybe? PERHAPS finance, but I don't play too well in that sandbox.

The gist I was going for was more that even in a dev's greatest successes, they will likely never see most of the returns they generate for others without taking on some sort of "other" role (founder, CTO, etc), while to the other side of that coin, we do often get hit by the fallout of a failure (slipping a deadline, etc) and certainly don't get a payout that I would consider MASSIVE.

I've heard many arguments that this is aligned with the respective risk we take, but as my original statement, I'd take a hell of a lot more risk if it meant never working again a day in my life, but that's not even a choice us normal schmucks can really make :) (I'm also not convinced the risk argument is even sound, as that one MONTH's pay at a top exec salary essentially frees me from financial risk for the rest of my life, whereas I'll be working for decades even at a top eng salary to achieve the same)

Re: Yahoo sold to US telecoms giant Verizon

#240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There has been a lot of debate as to whether she succeeded or failed at her job, but at the end of the day all I can say: I really chose the wrong career path, as I can't imagine a scenario where a dev's comparative performance results in a 218m$ payout. (In more direct terms, I would gladly take the internet-hate-firehose in the face if it means making even single digit millions.) To make some more reasonable statem…

Soon-to-be a freshman in college. If you don't mind me asking, what career path do you wish you took?

I believe he was being a being slightly tongue in cheek. In reply to your question though - never follow the money, follow the path where your interests lie and where your strengths lie. Biggest career mistake I ever made was to move from a job I really enjoyed to another because they offered to more than double my salary.
Post reply on HN