41–50 of 250 posts
Under the hood this is Webpack + Babel + ESLint with sane initial configuration. Love it.
I created something similar a month ago https://github.com/olahol/reactpack Doesn't seem like this project differs that much, although this looks to have the backing of core React developers.
I don't get why they would need to lock down the configuration and then have to offer the eject thingy. Couldn't they just offer a "facebook-certified" starter pack/bootstrap? I guess you could just do an immediate eject? Edit: looks like they contemplated that in the survey: "Yes, and I will run `eject` straight away"
No, because Facebook engineers don't use or need that. Facebook only open sources or releases stuff they use—except for this. This is actually the first and probably only open source project from Facebook that they don't use in production.
This is great for someone who wants to get started to learn React, but is missing a ton that is needed for a real world production app. * No isomorphic rendering * No hot module replacement * No generators * No dockerization * No Sass support * No test environment setup * No code splitting It would be cool to have a production ready tool from Facebook, but I'll stick with gluestick for now https://github.com/TrueCar/…
> Having just attended EmberCamp a week ago, I was excited about Ember CLI. Ember users have a great “getting started” experience thanks to a curated set of tools united under a single command-line interface. This is one of the best things about Ember. `ember new`, `ember serve`, ember generate component my-component`, `ember build`, `ember deploy`, `ember install`. It's opinionated but it lets you get productive rig…
Don't forget: https://www.ember-fastboot.com/ Also two commands to get server rendering working.
This is great for someone who wants to get started to learn React, but is missing a ton that is needed for a real world production app. * No isomorphic rendering * No hot module replacement * No generators * No dockerization * No Sass support * No test environment setup * No code splitting It would be cool to have a production ready tool from Facebook, but I'll stick with gluestick for now https://github.com/TrueCar/…
You just perfectly described the problem with Front End Engineering that this tries to tackle.
it seems like a solution to the Vjeux's challenge: http://blog.vjeux.com/2015/javascript/challenge-best-javascr... (If we don't count sharable requirement).
This is great for someone who wants to get started to learn React, but is missing a ton that is needed for a real world production app. * No isomorphic rendering * No hot module replacement * No generators * No dockerization * No Sass support * No test environment setup * No code splitting It would be cool to have a production ready tool from Facebook, but I'll stick with gluestick for now https://github.com/TrueCar/…
And it doesn't even write your app for you, how dare they!
This is great for someone who wants to get started to learn React, but is missing a ton that is needed for a real world production app. * No isomorphic rendering * No hot module replacement * No generators * No dockerization * No Sass support * No test environment setup * No code splitting It would be cool to have a production ready tool from Facebook, but I'll stick with gluestick for now https://github.com/TrueCar/…
I think the point of the project is to acknowledge that React requiring transpilation to use is 100% accurate and there needed to be a transpilation / workflow solution to make it easier to adopt. It wasn't let me solve every single problem for you, including setting up your production deployment environment using Docker.
The npm-version sits in a feature branch, just look for the corresponding PR if you're keen.