Throwaway account. In order to stay price competitive in our industry, we need to use a mix of junior, intermediate, and senior talent. We have never found a junior or newly-intermediate candidate successfully work remote. Part of the point in having senior people is for them to be available to guide the less learned staff, so it makes no sense for them to all be remote too. To be fair, for the right senior staffer,…
Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
31–40 of 148 posts
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#32Are there any success stories of early stage high growth startups that were started by a remote team? At least in the startup world, most people are concerned that you will miss that zeal and watercooler chat magic that is critical to early stage companies. I don't think anybody cares too much about your 1000th engineer being remote, the organizational DNA has already been set a long time ago.
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#33Are there any success stories of early stage high growth startups that were started by a remote team? At least in the startup world, most people are concerned that you will miss that zeal and watercooler chat magic that is critical to early stage companies. I don't think anybody cares too much about your 1000th engineer being remote, the organizational DNA has already been set a long time ago.
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#34How many decision makers are willing to admit that they are subconsciously using "chair time" as a measure of productivity?
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#35How many decision makers are willing to admit that they are subconsciously using "chair time" as a measure of productivity?
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#36I think BS. We just got a new remote QA team and they are doing great.
We have two remote devs also who are doing good work.
I interpret the evidence to show that remote does work.
I still get push back on it but the rationale is based on words like "better" and "easier" without quantifiers.
My feelings are that some managers like to interrupt frequently for "urgent fires" and that is easier when someone is a few metres away.
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#37Are there any success stories of early stage high growth startups that were started by a remote team? At least in the startup world, most people are concerned that you will miss that zeal and watercooler chat magic that is critical to early stage companies. I don't think anybody cares too much about your 1000th engineer being remote, the organizational DNA has already been set a long time ago.
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#38When I was at the office for a decade, 90% of the insight and productivity came from informal conversations in the hallway, lunches and things I overheard in passing. As a remote worker, nearly all communication is very deliberate so I am not exposed to those ad-hoc conversations. Everything is very deliberate: I receive an email, a text or a meeting. The net result is my personal career becomes very confined and stunted... I become that guy who does that one thing rather than a team-member who has an awareness of everything and the ability to jump in as needed.
Being remote also limits my upward mobility. Most of my promotions and moves were because I would walk back from a meeting with an executive and talk about what was discussed and express interest in taking ownership. These walk-and-talks are the only availability in an execs schedule. I tried to get time with an exec remotely and it was a full two months before I could get any time-- and since it was scheduled it wasn't ad-hoc and overly formal ("What would you like to discuss?").
So, in my judgement, remote workers are fine for very defined single tasks. For dynamic workers that move about the company and immerse themselves in lots of projects and want upward mobility, I can't recommend it.
I feel like my experience of being in office and remote at the same company gives me some unique perspective versus the people who join a company remotely and never fully appreciate what they are missing.
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#392. Rapport / Camaraderie: Knowing someone in-person, having lunch/dinner/coffee with them, having watercooler talks about casual stuff etc builds a rapport, which helps build closer work relationships. I don't think people in remote locations are any different than my colleagues here, but the rapport is simply not there if I am going to meet them on video conf or IM only a few times a week.
3. Impromptu discussions: These are triggered by spontaneous ideas, and ideas do not come according to a fixed schedule of meetings. By not having remote workers in these discussions, both sides lose (by not having more brains, as well as by missing out).
Re: Ask HN: If you don't permit telecommuting, why?
#40I am fine if a guy shows up two times a week or so but I am wary of full-time remote workers unless I know I can trust them to not waste time on irrelevant tangents. There needs to be some level of maturity.
Time zones are also an issue.I would not work with somebody 12 hours away.