Not an economist but my thoughts on the topic are that society can make changes to accommodate this. This isn't a catastrophe, we just need to prepare. I think this needs to/will happen: * labour will change from people having only one main skill to having multiple skills ("jack of all trades, master of none" will become "jack of all trades, master of fewer") * this will be made possible by the fact that technology m…
The trend here is that humans will become ubiquitous learning machines, valued for their ability to fulfill variable demand. Automation works well through economies of scale to fulfill large, steady amounts of demand. A.I. works well when there is a lot of existing data or logged activity to train on. For new, variable, or niche demand markets, Humans will be unique in that they can fill the demand faster than A.I. o…
What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
121–130 of 310 posts
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#122Honest question: Is it not widely accepted that 1) Eventually, and probably pretty soon (within 100years), that there obviously won't be jobs for everyone. Automation, progress(efficiency gains) and increasing population makes it inevitable. 2) That a general "goal" of society is do away with jobs. In any traditional sense. To me we've been approaching that ever since agriculture provided ability to support specialis…
Aren't specialist activities like science, art, and killing each other jobs?
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#123Then the government should either directly employ people or else provide them with an income, or some combination of these.
>Then the government should either directly employ people or else provide them with an income, or some combination of these. It is interesting to see that, in the early 21st century, communism is becoming palatable again. Could this be due to all of the old communist states either ceasing to exist or (for instance, the case of China) changing into something quite unlike their former sleves? In short, did we forget ab…
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#124First, there are plenty of jobs, but not enough people that have decided to develop themselves enough to have the skills to do them. For example (a real life one, unfortunately for me): I need a biopsy of a mass near my heart, but the current waiting time for this procedure here in Seattle (at both major hospitals) is two months. What we do have is plenty of regulations that constrain the supply of physicians, servic…
That's like saying there's plenty of room for musicians if you're Mozart. The amount of investment required to develop yourself for a target field has grown astronomically, but that's been coupled with a push down in wages. I know lawyers who spent a fortune for their degree, passed the Bar, and make barely more than minimum wage. Regulation isn't causing this; automation is causing this.
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#125Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
But not the money to pay for these jobs....But in most countries they receive social welfare while out of work. See the contradiction here? We could put these people to work engaging in labor that is valuable, but not as valuable as the cost of their welfare. I.e. pay them $7.25/hour to do $5/hour worth of labor (net cost to society = $2.25/hour). Yet we don't. Instead we pay them to play video games (net cost to soc…
The Japanese government is doing exactly literally what the parent comment describes - paying people to dig up and break apart rocks: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2013/05/19/environment/the-... This has been extremely destructive to the environment and has not done anything for the Japanese economy for the last 20 years. It has been effective as a way of transferring taxpayer money to construction company preside…
Is the same true of the US? Are those anti-government republicans right? Will it be actively harmful if the US government does even one more thing?
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#127First, there are plenty of jobs, but not enough people that have decided to develop themselves enough to have the skills to do them. For example (a real life one, unfortunately for me): I need a biopsy of a mass near my heart, but the current waiting time for this procedure here in Seattle (at both major hospitals) is two months. What we do have is plenty of regulations that constrain the supply of physicians, servic…
That's like saying there's plenty of room for musicians if you're Mozart. The amount of investment required to develop yourself for a target field has grown astronomically, but that's been coupled with a push down in wages. I know lawyers who spent a fortune for their degree, passed the Bar, and make barely more than minimum wage. Regulation isn't causing this; automation is causing this.
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#128First, there are plenty of jobs, but not enough people that have decided to develop themselves enough to have the skills to do them. For example (a real life one, unfortunately for me): I need a biopsy of a mass near my heart, but the current waiting time for this procedure here in Seattle (at both major hospitals) is two months. What we do have is plenty of regulations that constrain the supply of physicians, servic…
You do if you want to get paid to make it...
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's like saying there's plenty of room for musicians if you're Mozart. The amount of investment required to develop yourself for a target field has grown astronomically, but that's been coupled with a push down in wages. I know lawyers who spent a fortune for their degree, passed the Bar, and make barely more than minimum wage. Regulation isn't causing this; automation is causing this.
To see why that is true, imagine we lived in a sports-based economy. In such a marketplace, I would be a flop. You could supply me with the world’s best instruction, and I could endlessly strive to improve my skills. But, alas, on the gridiron or basketball court I would never command even a minimum wage. The brutal truth is that an advanced economic system, whether it be geared to physical or mental skills, will lea…
Even the scraps of giants make me better off than I'd be in either of those places.
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#130Honest question: Is it not widely accepted that 1) Eventually, and probably pretty soon (within 100years), that there obviously won't be jobs for everyone. Automation, progress(efficiency gains) and increasing population makes it inevitable. 2) That a general "goal" of society is do away with jobs. In any traditional sense. To me we've been approaching that ever since agriculture provided ability to support specialis…
2 doesn't actually argue that the goal is to do away with jobs, just with low-end jobs. I'm not sure that it's as widely accepted as 1, but I think it's more true than 1 is.