What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
blogs.wsj.com
What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
1–10 of 310 posts
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#2Here is a press release from the folks who authored the study: http://rooseveltinstitute.org/demand_side_dynamism/
And here is the paper (warning: pdf): http://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Dec...
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#3The TL;DR: "A new paper says the problem is not supply. It’s that firms just don’t have enough demand for labor." Here is a press release from the folks who authored the study: http://rooseveltinstitute.org/demand_side_dynamism/ And here is the paper (warning: pdf): http://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Dec...
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#4The answer to "what happens to workers being replaced" has always been "they'll find jobs elsewhere, every time you make a job redundant you create other new jobs", what I've seen called the "infinite work hypothesis" where there will always be new work and the problem is agility, job training, not demand.
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#5Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#6Is the "infinite work hypothesis" finally ending?? The answer to "what happens to workers being replaced" has always been "they'll find jobs elsewhere, every time you make a job redundant you create other new jobs", what I've seen called the "infinite work hypothesis" where there will always be new work and the problem is agility, job training, not demand.
There's a huge to-do list of jobs that need to be done at almost every level, from design and build of significant infrastructure in most countries around the world, to community-level support work.
It would be perfectly possible to retrain the long term unemployed for all but the most difficult design and management elements.
They're not done because the metrics of Wall St deem them "not profitable" - which means traders can't make quick gains out of them.
Allocating labor on the basis of whether or not traders and stock owners can profit in the short to medium term turns out to be an unintelligent way to strategise an economy.
Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#7Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#8Re: What If There Just Aren’t Enough Jobs to Go Around?
#9The two times where labor was more valuable than capital.
1 | After the black death in Europe
2 | After the second world war
Most of history's default was the gilded age, the roman empire survived for 600[1] years with having worse inequality than in the modern times.
Usually the only way to reverse the trend is by a large scale elimination of significant portion of young people.
[1] EDIT : correction