Earlier quoted context omitted.
No you can't, all the content there is DRM'ed. I believe many people care about running their videos where they like. For example, Amazon video does not work at all on Linux because there is no DRM support there.
You're confusing streaming (renting) with purchasing. On iTunes, EVERYTHING is DRM free. If you purchase it, you get a mp4 (or mov), and that's it. No DRM. So nothing is stopping you from paying for much of this content legally.
Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
141–150 of 356 posts
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#142This will be interesting to watch. Torrent sites only host torrent files; I'm sure he'll argue that the DMCA requests were invalid because the people filing them didn't own copyright to the torrent files, which were the only thing that the site distributed. Where do we draw the line? Do we prosecute people for posting a magnet link? If a movie studio puts an MP4 of a not-yet-released film on its servers, is it illega…
Aren't file-hashes derived works?
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#143Two things: If you're going to build a torrent indexer, don't profit from it. Keep it alive yourself, with NO ads, just plain HTML and JS and images.
Second: This is why I vastly prefer usenet.
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, Americans have been saying that about drug war, civil forfeiture, surveillance and many others things for a long long time.
Except that civil forfeiture is extremely profitable enterprise [1]. [1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-...
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#145I read the majority of comments here on HN about dated business models, big corporation dislike, the old executives don't understand the new market, etc..., but then a young indie artist in LA finds out Zara the clothing retailer has obviously copied her designs, and the lynch mobs are out to boycott Zara, send letters and other things to Zara and their attorneys. [1]
I have not inquired directly, but I am guessing a number of the indie artist's supporters have downloaded a torrent or two. How do they morally distinguish the two, or how does anybody who is against copyright or property rights of IP?
[1] https://www.buzzfeed.com/victoriasanusi/an-independent-artis...
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, Americans have been saying that about drug war, civil forfeiture, surveillance and many others things for a long long time.
... and its important to say, as experience shows, at this point its sadly irrelevant what average americans say. while OP is right -- this doesn't seem to serve majority, the truth is that the system is rigged and this supposed to serve a few multinational corporations that feel their profits are severely cut due to copyright infringement, meanwhile posting record earnings. it is still mind-boggling to me that this…
That almost sounds like a Bernie Sanders level paranoia of words profits and corporations. Honestly share-worthy content exists because of these entities in first and I will never fault HBO, Adobe or Microsoft going after those who are pirating their software. I think it is government who is going after someone who cant defend himself and just pretending to have done something.
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are there any good examples of when this works the other way around? A US citizen being extradited to another country for non-violent crimes? Something in tune of computer hacking or hosting a website? Other than drugs and murders, I have a hard time believing US govt to give out its citizens to third parties...
You could start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:People_extradited_fro... Of those, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stein_Bagger , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaston_Bastiaens , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kirk_(New_Zealand_politic... are not drug or violence related on a quick glance.
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#148"Do you have a legal right to distribute this content?" "No." "Do you respect the people who spent their personal time and their money to make the content you distribute?" "Yes of course." "No you don't or you would get their permission first." "I don't think whether I respect the creators or not has anything to do with making their content available, which is what I want to do." "Will you please get their permission…
"$32.5 million"
"And how much was the revenue?"
"$475 million"
"So you had a $442.5 million profit!"
"No, no. We had no profit - we use Hollywood accounting"
Repeat for Forrest Gump, Spider-Man, etc.
Real sad, these modern morals. Real sad. If you don't respect others, they ain't gonna respect you.
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#149As an American, I wish we would stop doing this. It isn't effective, and it's a waste of time/resources that could be better spent elsewhere. I'd even argue that its counter-effective to progress. Instead of punishing people for making more efficient systems, we should reward them, and try to integrate.
A person in the US who, for example, wants to watch all but the latest season of Game of Thrones can go to iTunes and, within seconds, purchase and start watching. And it will be in better quality than the torrent which was ripped off some TV broadcast and re-compressed. iTunes is available for both Windows and Mac (plus various iOS) and is super simple to use. And the one purchase lets you either stream or download…
We have a 21st century distribution model tied to a mid-20th century legal framework and business model. It's hard to say what is fair in every case. What I feel is not fair is throwing the book at all of these site owners, especially when the laws are written in the U.S. but are somehow stretched to where they apply to people who never set foot there.
In 5-10 years, they could still be in jail while technology remakes itself to the point where either distribution and payment has finally started working gain, or torrenting has gotten to the point where it's nearly impossible to trace the activity to any one person. Neither option seems unlikely, and punishing people now for something that doesn't hurt anyone too much does not seem like it's worth it.
Re: Alleged founder of world’s largest BitTorrent distribution site arrested
#150"Do you have a legal right to distribute this content?" "No." "Do you respect the people who spent their personal time and their money to make the content you distribute?" "Yes of course." "No you don't or you would get their permission first." "I don't think whether I respect the creators or not has anything to do with making their content available, which is what I want to do." "Will you please get their permission…
"Yes"