Live data from Hacker News

Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

nytimes.com

31–40 of 223 posts

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#31
post #6

There are quite a few Trump supporters in the Valley, but they simply stay quiet because they will get 'racist' yelled at them and it will potentially hurt their careers.

I don't even think we're that rare. The more left leaning folks around here are just _really_ left though, so staying quiet makes more sense most of the time.

What do you like about him?

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#32
post #21

There are quite a few Trump supporters in the Valley, but they simply stay quiet because they will get 'racist' yelled at them and it will potentially hurt their careers.

There are plenty of racists around, that's true.

Yup, this is exactly the kind of behavior OP was talking about.

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#34
post #23

There are quite a few Trump supporters in the Valley, but they simply stay quiet because they will get 'racist' yelled at them and it will potentially hurt their careers.

Yup...and I'm quite curious how the author squares these two lines: > [Thiel] will become the most prominent public face of a species so endangered it might as well be called extinct: the Silicon Valley Trump supporter. and > The danger, then, is that not only could Mr. Thiel’s public embrace of Mr. Trump backfire on him, but it could also become another plot point in the larger story line that Silicon Valley is excl…

That actually does make sense, negative signalling is powerful, there are many blaming silicon valley for all sorts of problems in society (AI killing jobs, rents in the bay area rising etc) and it would be easy to then take the views of a prominent valley figure and superimpose them onto all of the valley, even if <0,01% support trump.

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#35

There are quite a few Trump supporters in the Valley, but they simply stay quiet because they will get 'racist' yelled at them and it will potentially hurt their careers.

Why not more Gary Johnson supporters?

Because there has been a collapse in right-leaning libertarianism in the post Ron Paul era. Libertarianism has shifted to the left and there has been an exodus of right-libertarians to various flavors of nationalism.

I think this is one of the major intellectual stories of the last decade, largely uncovered by the media.

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#36

There are quite a few Trump supporters in the Valley, but they simply stay quiet because they will get 'racist' yelled at them and it will potentially hurt their careers.

Don't you think being a Trump supporter =should= hurt most people's careers? It's pretty poor judgment, for starters.

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#38
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perot got 18.9% of the popular vote in 1992. Gonna be tough to beat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_ele...

That was before the Republican party ran completely off the rails, and embraced the old white scared vote.

True. Not saying it can't happen. I just think it's unlikely. I think Johnson is currently polling somewhere around 10%? I guess the big hurdle will be getting in the debates like Perot did. Not sure what the current rules are for that.

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#39
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Trump has an extensive history of using racism to divide people for his own benefit.

Examples? Should be pretty easy to find if it is an "extensive history"

Saying Gonzalo Curiel (born in Indiana) can't be impartial in a court case involving Trump "University" because he's mexican is one example.

Re: Peter Thiel’s Embrace of Trump Has Silicon Valley Squirming

#40
post #15

> After that, he suggested, things went south because, among other things, women were given the right to vote. Wow, does Peter Thiel really think that women shouldn't be allowed to vote?

The article is referring to a line from this article: http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/education...

The line in question: " Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron."

Post reply on HN