I think the most impressive part is that apparently the same system and code had been running for 15 years as the number of transactions reported on had increased exponentially
They did, it just left out a few transactions (26,810 transactions over 15 years is a very small number).
Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
21–30 of 114 posts
Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#22$7m is pocket change for Citigroup. No wonder the big banks keep shitting the bed. There's never any real consequences for their fuckups.
> Citigroup failing to send information on 26,810 transactions in over 2,300 such requests. 26810 requests, do you think they made more than $7m on this? It's about proportional fines. Just because they're a giant company doesn't mean we should find then $1b for forgetting to put a handicapped parking space at one of their offices.
I think Finnish speeding fines are a percent of income.
Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#23Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#24Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Citigroup failing to send information on 26,810 transactions in over 2,300 such requests. 26810 requests, do you think they made more than $7m on this? It's about proportional fines. Just because they're a giant company doesn't mean we should find then $1b for forgetting to put a handicapped parking space at one of their offices.
There is a school of thought that punitive fines should be a proportion of company value/earnings rather than an absolute dollar figure to exact an equal amount of discomfort. I think Finnish speeding fines are a percent of income.
Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#26function should_not_exclude_10B_10C(x) { if ("089" should_not_exclude_10B_10C("10B")
should_not_exclude_10B_10C("10C")
Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#27Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#28Synopsis: SEC sends clear message to tech people in finance: shut the fuck up if you find something, silently fix it, and sweep the remaining crumbs under the rug, or else your company will be fined millions.
Re: Citigroup fined $7m after legit transactions mistaken for test data for 15 years
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
They did, it just left out a few transactions (26,810 transactions over 15 years is a very small number).
Good point. Just under 5 transactions a day really. I think the point that's really annoyed the sec is the number of years they have to go back and correct now that they have the right data.