Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Famous Programmers' Editor Choices?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 18 posts

Ask HN: Famous Programmers' Editor Choices?

#1
Dennis Ritchie used and Russ Cox and Rob Pike use acme.

Ken Thompson, Bjarne Stroustrup, Doug McIllroy, Tom Duff and Brian Kernighan use sam.

What editors do other famous programmers use? Do other famous programmers also use mouse-based editors like sam and acme? What other editors are used by famous programmers?

Why do so many Hacker News readers have such an aversion to using the mouse when editing if these luminaries of computing have all moved on to mouse-based editors?

Re: Ask HN: Famous Programmers' Editor Choices?

#2
> Why do so many Hacker News readers have such an aversion to using the mouse when editing if these luminaries of computing have all moved on to mouse-based editors?

Because most of the HN readers (those who are programmers, anyway) are down-in-the-trenches programmers, and as such, they choose whatever editor/environment makes it the easiest to edit source code. If it is Vim, it is Vim then. If it is Emacs, Emacs it is. Nano, Elvis, ed, Sublime Text, LibreOffice Writer, Inkscape, Gimp -- whatever helps to write. It's the code that is published on SvnHub or whatever, after all, not the environment's settings.

Re: Ask HN: Famous Programmers' Editor Choices?

#6

Who cares what those people use? Use the tool that's right for you.

Everyone who has looked at the website usesthis.com? Use the tool that's right for you, but that doesn't mean it's not interesting (at least to many) what experts use, whether we're discussing software, golf clubs or tennis racquets.

Re: Ask HN: Famous Programmers' Editor Choices?

#10
post #2

> Why do so many Hacker News readers have such an aversion to using the mouse when editing if these luminaries of computing have all moved on to mouse-based editors? Because most of the HN readers (those who are programmers, anyway) are down-in-the-trenches programmers, and as such, they choose whatever editor/environment makes it the easiest to edit source code. If it is Vim, it is Vim then. If it is Emacs, Emacs it…

Totally agree. Hacker News readers like to promote their favorite, but I think most of us are ultimately pragmatists. For example, Vim is a personal favorite, but I've been using Microsoft Office's built-in VBA editor for most of my recent programming because it fits the problem I'm trying to solve best.
Post reply on HN