Live data from Hacker News

Forestry.io

forestry.io

71–80 of 93 posts

Re: Forestry.io

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hahaha. Co-creator here. I know, it's silly. Here's how we came up with it: My partner and I used to drive 2 hours to meet our team every Monday at our old startup. We conceived of the idea on one of these drives and the conversation went like this: Jordan - "So what are we going to call this thing?" Scott - "I don't know, some cool .io name?" We passed an RV that had a "Caravan" logo on it Scott - "Like caravan.io"…

Jordan was right.

Nah. It's cool. Their cms spawns a forest of small websites. That's some fine Forestry imo.

Re: Forestry.io

#73

I'm using mobile and the adding website flow is smooth and concise. I connected my blog hosted on GitHub. The only caveat is that this requires permission to access everything on your GitHub account, public and private repositories, and permission to do anything with them. However, after adding the website repository, I'm not able to see any posts, is this only for pages? There are some UI issues with page editor on…

Unfortunately GitHub doesn't give great control over permissions. The only thing we can choose from is access to all public repos, or access to all public and private repos. We can't specify that we want only the user repos and not the organization or vice versa.

I will certainly have a look at the issue you are having. Could you contact us via our support tool on the site? Or email us at support at forestry.io.

Re: Forestry.io

#74
post #70
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. I'm always confused how non-descriptive stories make it to the frontpage of HN though...

Getting friends to upvote their submissions, I'd guess.

I wish. This took us by surprise. We didn't know it was submitted until it was already on the front page.

Re: Forestry.io

#75
post #50

This is great! I have a bit of feedback though: - Does it really need access to my private repos too? I don't get to only let it see public repos? There's a reason some of my repos are private, and I don't really feel comfortable letting a third-party accessing them. - It's a bit weird that my posts are listed in reverse chronological order. - Having a way do add a description and required formatting (string, date, i…

GitHub's api permissions aren't very granular. We can choose between all public repos, or all public and private repos. A lot of our users have their site in a private repo as it is for an internal wiki or simply a site they are still developing. Giving the user the ability to choose between all public and all public and private complicates the flow, especially if you chose all public when you started and then later want to access a private repo. This is something that we will take into consideration as the the product grows though.

Your posts should be listed with the most recent first. This seems to be pretty standard across content management systems. However, we will have sorting out into production soon.

I'm not 100% certain what you mean with regards to frontmatter. Right now, when you create a new page/post the fields that show up are determined by the frontmatter defaults (in Jekyll) or the archetype (in Hugo). The type of data that a field accepts is derived from the content in existing fields. We are working on giving the user the ability to change the content type of a given field and to add additional frontmatter fields.

The fields are derived from the frontmatter in a content file. If the content file has a date field in frontmatter, you will see a date field. I realize that Jekyll incorporates the date into the name of the content file so you may not have a reason to add a date field to frontmatter. I'll add that to my todo list.

Re: Forestry.io

#76
post #3

Looks good! Can I buy the software and run it locally? I'm extremely interested for a client, but there is no way they will surrender ownership of their content to a third party - and I sadly won't suggest they do. I assume they could pay 150-300 bucks for a single-site license and something like 5-6 pages. Their website is very small. Honestly, cook up a license with per n-page fees and I'm sure you'll sell a bunch.

Is is only a hosted solution for now. However, if you keep your content in a repo on GitHub or Bitbucket, you can connect that to Forestry and Forestry will commit any changes back to your repo. There is no surrender of content required. Since Jekyll is open source and you retain your content in the form of a Jekyll project, there is really nothing we could do "lock you in" per say.

Re: Forestry.io

#77
post #65

Any plans on supporting Gitlab and Gitlab Pages? Would also be stoked if it was open source, I'd probably still pay for the service but just knowing that it is OSS and that I could tweak it myself would be great.

We will certainly be adding support for Gitlab. It is not open source right now. But it is something we are considering in the future.

Re: Forestry.io

#78

Not a very descriptive headline. I see many headlines like this on Hacker News with just a name, and I often skip over them. Give people some information to draw them in, and to assure them it will not be a waste of time. All I can assume at this point is that your site is about forestry. Edit: I have looked at the site, and indeed it has nothing to do with forestry. You would do well to include in the headline the s…

Sorry, my fault, and I agree with you. I quickly submitted this just before bed as a reminder and found it on the front-page today. Also, I'm not linked with the creators in any way, just genuinely interested about the service itself.

Re: Forestry.io

#79
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We are working on permissions. Ideally, what would you like to see?

Awesome. Probably an Admin/Editor/Writer hierarchy where admins can manage both Posts, Pages, and Chunks, and Editors can edit all writers' posts, whereas Writers can only create posts and edit their own. Perhaps Writers could also be restricted to only submitting a post for publication, which the editor could then pull the trigger on. Chunks are really interesting, but I feel that permissions should be more granular…

Thanks for the feedback. I've added your comments to our other thoughts on permissions.

Re: Forestry.io

#80
post #49

You might want to do a comparison vs wordpress. I would love to use another cms system, but wp is not only wp, it is an ecosystem of products for building websites, how does forestry compare to that? Can forestry reduce my development cost for custom solutions?

You are right, Wordpress is not just Wordpress. And the obvious thing that we are missing is the plugin ecosystem that Wordpress has.

That being said, if you can do without plugins, I would highly recommend using a static site generator as it can reduce your development cost as well as your management cost. There is no backend to build and no server to manage. Forestry is a tool to allow you to take advantage of the benefits of a static site generator from a development and management perspective, and still allow your clients/users to be able to manage their content.

Post reply on HN