Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think they shouldn't have complained about something that everyone was following > they weren’t going to complain. That is, “until I noticed one of the workers always wore flat shoes that were made from a fabric other than leather, or running shoes, even though both of these things were contrary to the dress code.” The interns were told that was a medical exemption… after they were mass-fired, but not when they i…
>The interns were told that was a medical exemption… after they were mass-fired, but not when they initially inquired about the possibility of relaxed dress code: People do have a right to privacy. The person with a medical issue may have asked that details not be disclosed to his/her co-workers. The questionable part of this story might not be that the interns were terminated but that the existence of the medical is…
Which management obviously didn't care about since they ended up telling the interns about it (apparently as a shaming tool since they specifically mentioned service).
> The person with a medical issue may have asked that the nature of the issue not be disclosed to his/her co-workers.
Which they did not have to at any point, management could just have answered the initial question with "they have a medical exemption".