How is this a 'threat'?
Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
21–30 of 86 posts
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're a US citizen, you would be a bit better off if it was a US server, because the records from the server would be available to the US court system. This is helpful if a customer ends up suing the company, or if there is a security breach that is investigated by US-based law enforcement. I agree, the inclusion does hint at Sinophobia. But it's also a valid detail for security conscious customers to consider.
Why is it "Sinophobia" to state a fact about where the server is located?
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#23Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're a US citizen, you would be a bit better off if it was a US server, because the records from the server would be available to the US court system. This is helpful if a customer ends up suing the company, or if there is a security breach that is investigated by US-based law enforcement. I agree, the inclusion does hint at Sinophobia. But it's also a valid detail for security conscious customers to consider.
Why is it "Sinophobia" to state a fact about where the server is located?
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#25I am assuming the employee-gets-fired threat is not plausible.
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're a US citizen, you would be a bit better off if it was a US server, because the records from the server would be available to the US court system. This is helpful if a customer ends up suing the company, or if there is a security breach that is investigated by US-based law enforcement. I agree, the inclusion does hint at Sinophobia. But it's also a valid detail for security conscious customers to consider.
I don't see how this would be considered Sinophobia given the history of high-profile security breaches caused by hackers operating out of China. If the article reported that the data were being sent unencrypted to a Russian server, would that be considered Russophobia?
The current phrasing is clumsy and reads like a dogwhistle, although I doubt that was the author's intent.
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#27Of note, from the amazon review: "But before we get to that: I received this product at a discount in return for writing an honest review of it. Onwards!" Could that have anything to do with the manufacturer's attitude?
I sort of wonder if Amazon is the entity providing the discount. (I spent a minute trying to figure it out and didn't find anything)
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is it "Sinophobia" to state a fact about where the server is located?
The suggestion is that the location of the server wouldn't have been reported if it went to say...Germany. Or Ireland.
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#29I'm not sure if I'm more scared of a company that makes horridly insecure devices and then tells its employees "do everything you can, be as manipulative as you can, but get this review taken down", or if I'm more scared of a company that actually tells its employees "I will fire you if you don't get this review taken down".
Re: Security researcher gets threats over Amazon review
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see how this would be considered Sinophobia given the history of high-profile security breaches caused by hackers operating out of China. If the article reported that the data were being sent unencrypted to a Russian server, would that be considered Russophobia?
I think the author could have explained why this detail's inclusion was relevant, as you did very well. The current phrasing is clumsy and reads like a dogwhistle, although I doubt that was the author's intent.
> But if you’re not home, your phone sends the command to a server in China, which then passes the command along to the socket.
> The result is that the unique network ID of your socket is transported in an unencrypted form to the Chinese server — and anyone who gets their hands on the ID can then control the socket.
The problem with tying this to the other security breaches caused by Chinese hackers would actually make this article _more_ sensationalist because that would allege that this company is somehow affiliated with the hacking activity.
If the company and server were located in other countries other than the US, it is highly likely that the author would specify the country as well.