The warp drive will have to wait
11–20 of 88 posts
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#12Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#13EM drive is not an argument such that it might be refuted. It is a device. As such it has fitness for purpose, which depends entirely on the purpose at hand. Snarkiness << skepticism.
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#14I dont see any other article on the internets discussing these results
[1] https://tu-dresden.de/die_tu_dresden/fakultaeten/fakultaet_m...
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#15If something sounds too good to be true, it usually isn't true.
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#16I guess a cheap and efficient propulsion that doesn't fit our understanding of physics was too good to be true. Still, it's a bit sad, that would have been beautiful if it were true.
If we never take the time to explore claims that violate our current understanding, our understanding will stop advancing. Too many scientists are overly dogmatic.
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#17If something sounds too good to be true, it usually isn't true.
Or, it's a scientific breakthrough. That won't happen often, but it also can't be ruled out completely.
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#18If something sounds too good to be true, it usually isn't true.
But when it is...
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#19I wonder what was causing the measurement, then. Magnetic repulsion due to the current flowing through the cable?
Re: The warp drive will have to wait
#20I think the best sentence is this: "The theoretical expectation is that you don't measure anything. Now you're measuring something, and you can learn extremely much on this hunt for the error."
"If the result confirms the hypothesis, then you've made a measurement. If the result is contrary to the hypothesis, then you've made a discovery."