Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
11–20 of 43 posts
Re: Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
#12Southern CA, for the most part (or at best the central valley).
That's underwhelming and I wouldn't call it "improved" in the slightest.
edit: on refresh it thinks I'm around the Azores or maybe the south coast of Greenland. Not impressed.
Re: Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
#13Hint: I don't live in the northern one.
Re: Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
#14Ran this about 10 times, it never once entered the correct hemisphere. Hint: I don't live in the northern one.
Re: Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
#15Ran this about 10 times, it never once entered the correct hemisphere. Hint: I don't live in the northern one.
Re: Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
#16Re: Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
#17Re: Show HN: Improved passive TCP/IP geolocation
#18It always ends up stuck south east of it. I am in San Francisco.
The other passive geo system put a larger circle right around SF when I tried it.
My guess is that none of the hosts it pings are to the north or west of me, or that they stick the hosts on a grid that doesn't wrap around to the nearest location, so it is biased towards the east/south.