21–30 of 48 posts
Am I the only one skeptical in thinking that they didn't really sell 200 stars worth 200 USD each and they are making this up?
And, now the number sold is up to 340...
Edit: Make that 361 (2 min later).
Edit: Make that 421 (9 min later).
Edit: Make that 471 (11 min later)
What is the benefit of owning a star right now? Why is owning a star better than a planet?
Am I the only one skeptical in thinking that they didn't really sell 200 stars worth 200 USD each and they are making this up?
You're absolutely not the only one. And, now the number sold is up to 340... Edit: Make that 361 (2 min later). Edit: Make that 421 (9 min later). Edit: Make that 471 (11 min later)
Surprised they are taking USD or any fiat for that matter.
What did you expect them to take shiny sea shells?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're absolutely not the only one. And, now the number sold is up to 340... Edit: Make that 361 (2 min later). Edit: Make that 421 (9 min later). Edit: Make that 471 (11 min later)
At this rate, they'll be sold out by the time it's supposed to go "public".
Surprised they are taking USD or any fiat for that matter.
They need to get paid, and they need to buy the IPv4 addresses that would actually make Urbit functional. What did you expect them to take shiny sea shells?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They need to get paid, and they need to buy the IPv4 addresses that would actually make Urbit functional. What did you expect them to take shiny sea shells?
Many companies are paying their teams in BTC these days. Why do they need to buy IPv4 addresses? I haven't read the whitepaper.
As for the Addresses Urbit needs to run on something, the projec it so vague and the terms they are using are so for lack of better words ludicrous that I can't even understand what they are selling even after reading the white paper.
Data lifestreams, Digital reputation, all of that sounds like complete technobabel to me.