Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#2Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#3Telegram is one of my bets on a good, sane messaging platform for the future (vector/matrix is another, tent and even twitter used to be)
Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#4Nice idea. Will test it out. Telegram is one of my bets on a good, sane messaging platform for the future (vector/matrix is another, tent and even twitter used to be)
Why? It was made by VK (russian Facebook) devs and there are many concerns about its security.
Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#5Nice idea. Will test it out. Telegram is one of my bets on a good, sane messaging platform for the future (vector/matrix is another, tent and even twitter used to be)
> Telegram is one of my bets on a good, sane messaging platform for the future Why? It was made by VK (russian Facebook) devs and there are many concerns about its security.
Yeah, it's possible to have security like Signal, but then synchronization between devices is PITA and the rate of new features is slow.
It was not done by VK. It was done by Pavel Durov after he escaped from Russia.
Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Telegram is one of my bets on a good, sane messaging platform for the future Why? It was made by VK (russian Facebook) devs and there are many concerns about its security.
Well, it's about the same level of security as other messengers like Facebook Messenger/Skype/..., it has a great robot API, is continuously updated on all platforms, is adding features fast, it has a great GUI, it "just works" everywhere. Yeah, it's possible to have security like Signal, but then synchronization between devices is PITA and the rate of new features is slow. It was not done by VK. It was done by Pavel…
> Yeah, it's possible to have security like Signal [...]
Actually, WhatsApp has implemented Signal's encryption and they worked together with Moxie Marlinspike (the developer of Signal) who verified those claims (or something along these lines. I'm not 100% sure this is how it happened, please take it with a grain of salt). So at least one popular messenger implements security that is better than Telegram.
Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, it's about the same level of security as other messengers like Facebook Messenger/Skype/..., it has a great robot API, is continuously updated on all platforms, is adding features fast, it has a great GUI, it "just works" everywhere. Yeah, it's possible to have security like Signal, but then synchronization between devices is PITA and the rate of new features is slow. It was not done by VK. It was done by Pavel…
> Well, it's about the same level of security as other messengers like Facebook Messenger/Skype/.. [...] > Yeah, it's possible to have security like Signal [...] Actually, WhatsApp has implemented Signal's encryption and they worked together with Moxie Marlinspike (the developer of Signal) who verified those claims (or something along these lines. I'm not 100% sure this is how it happened, please take it with a grain…
Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#8Nice idea. Will test it out. Telegram is one of my bets on a good, sane messaging platform for the future (vector/matrix is another, tent and even twitter used to be)
> Telegram is one of my bets on a good, sane messaging platform for the future Why? It was made by VK (russian Facebook) devs and there are many concerns about its security.
2. "Many concerns" only accumulate to one bad default setting (namely end to end encryption opt-in).
People should stop spreading the same FUD over and over, it makes me wonder whether those people posting messages on social media to influence online conversions also post on HN.
Re: Show HN: Telegram bot with filters to read Hacker News
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Well, it's about the same level of security as other messengers like Facebook Messenger/Skype/.. [...] > Yeah, it's possible to have security like Signal [...] Actually, WhatsApp has implemented Signal's encryption and they worked together with Moxie Marlinspike (the developer of Signal) who verified those claims (or something along these lines. I'm not 100% sure this is how it happened, please take it with a grain…
BTW, if we treat any claims about privacy and security with extreme skepticism (rightfully), then why do we trust Moxie and Facebook without being able to verify their claims? (I'm not saying that Moxie et al. are untrustworthy.)