Live data from Hacker News

Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

engadget.com

11–20 of 250 posts

Re: Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

#14
post #4

I don't need more range or more speed. I need it to reliably connect and stay connected while devices are well within range of each other, and stop breaking every time I upgrade anything. Unfortunately that would require making it less complex, which is about as likely as a broken egg spontaneously reassembling.

I'd also like it to consume less power. I know the current standard touts itself as "low-energy" but I can see a very noticeable increase in battery drain when I have it enabled on my phone. So I always keep it disabled.

Re: Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

#15
post #4

I don't need more range or more speed. I need it to reliably connect and stay connected while devices are well within range of each other, and stop breaking every time I upgrade anything. Unfortunately that would require making it less complex, which is about as likely as a broken egg spontaneously reassembling.

It seems likely that "more range" also translates to "more robust at existing ranges" (but I have no facts to back that up)

Re: Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

#16
post #4

I don't need more range or more speed. I need it to reliably connect and stay connected while devices are well within range of each other, and stop breaking every time I upgrade anything. Unfortunately that would require making it less complex, which is about as likely as a broken egg spontaneously reassembling.

It seems likely that "more range" also translates to "more robust at existing ranges" (but I have no facts to back that up)

This is what I need. Phone in pocket and Bluetooth headset on neck results in buffer dropouts when I'm mid stride. I have to hold my phone in my hand to get stable playback. And I'm using Bluetooth 4.

Re: Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

#17
post #4

I don't need more range or more speed. I need it to reliably connect and stay connected while devices are well within range of each other, and stop breaking every time I upgrade anything. Unfortunately that would require making it less complex, which is about as likely as a broken egg spontaneously reassembling.

As a matter of fact "more range" is quite the opposite of what I want from Bluetooth. Do I really need to have 5000 keyboards within range of my computer at the office, instead of the 100 I already have? I definitely do not.

Headphones are the big benefactor here, for me at least. I can walk to the kitchen with my wireless headphones.

Re: Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

#18
post #4

I don't need more range or more speed. I need it to reliably connect and stay connected while devices are well within range of each other, and stop breaking every time I upgrade anything. Unfortunately that would require making it less complex, which is about as likely as a broken egg spontaneously reassembling.

As a matter of fact "more range" is quite the opposite of what I want from Bluetooth. Do I really need to have 5000 keyboards within range of my computer at the office, instead of the 100 I already have? I definitely do not.

I need the range. I routinely grab my phone when I'm cooking dinner and walk to the living room causing my bluetooth speaker to make awful noises.

Re: Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

#19
I think a lot of the comments here could be attributed to the terrible Bluetooth software stacks that are around (Car head-decks, Android (all versions), Windows 8-10 default stacks).

I've got a brand new Plugable BT4 dongle that barely works in Win 10 because Broadcom haven't updated their suite so it relies on the default 10 drivers - you can't have a HFP and A2DP service running at the same time so a headset with speakers and mic won't work.

Re: Bluetooth 5 will quadruple the range, double the speed

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a matter of fact "more range" is quite the opposite of what I want from Bluetooth. Do I really need to have 5000 keyboards within range of my computer at the office, instead of the 100 I already have? I definitely do not.

Headphones are the big benefactor here, for me at least. I can walk to the kitchen with my wireless headphones.

I've found that microwave interferes very strongly with Bluetooth headphones
Post reply on HN