Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Announcing .NET Core 1.0

blogs.msdn.microsoft.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 327 posts

Re: Announcing .NET Core 1.0

#52

Post by RomanPushkin »

AndreyErmakov wrote: post #19

A bit unrelated, but I'm hoping to hear something soon about the future licensing model for the upcoming SQL Server on Linux. Do we get a free version without DB size / CPU / RAM limitations (but perhaps with some other restrictions) that smaller companies and startups can use in production? I'm planning to run my future ASP.NET MVC projects on Linux and very much would like to know if a better SQL Server Express / C…

You can go ahead with PostreSQL if you use Entity Framework and Code First approach. I used it many times and I was able to quickly jump from PostreSQL to MS SQL and back. It just works. With EF I don't see any reason why I should tie to any particular SQL database

Re: Announcing .NET Core 1.0

#54

Post by AndreyErmakov »

insulanian wrote: post #37
AndreyErmakov wrote: post #19

A bit unrelated, but I'm hoping to hear something soon about the future licensing model for the upcoming SQL Server on Linux. Do we get a free version without DB size / CPU / RAM limitations (but perhaps with some other restrictions) that smaller companies and startups can use in production? I'm planning to run my future ASP.NET MVC projects on Linux and very much would like to know if a better SQL Server Express / C…

Why limit yourself with Express/ Community if you can get full featured RDBMS with Postgres?

Because I really like the power of SSDT (SQL Server Data Tools) and how nicely it integrates with Visual Studio and would like to continue using that instrument if possible.

But I can't seriously build a complex product around SQL Server knowing that 10GB is the sky for my database.

Re: Announcing .NET Core 1.0

#55

Post by dragonwriter »

jderick wrote: post #12

Does this represent some kind of change for .NET? Why is it called 1.0?

Its the first non-preview release of the product called ".NET Core"; it is, therefore, versioned as ".NET Core 1.0".

This is a different (but related) product to the .NET Framework (current version, 4.6) -- future versions of the .NET Framework will be built on top of .NET Core, which will be updated more frequently than the larger Framework. So, maybe .NET Framework 5.0 will be built on something like .NET Core 1.3 -- or 2.0, whatever.

Re: Announcing .NET Core 1.0

#56

Post by runesoerensen »

dreamsofdragons wrote: post #53

Is this the release of .Net Core and ASP.Net Core, or is this just the .Net Core?

First line of the blog post: We are excited to announce the release of .NET Core 1.0, ASP.NET Core 1.0 and Entity Framework 1.0, available on Windows, OS X and Linux!

Re: Announcing .NET Core 1.0

#58

Post by jsingleton »

donatj wrote: post #26

I'm receiving > “dotnet-dev-osx-x64.1.0.0-preview2-003121.pkg” can’t be opened because it is from an unidentified developer." I know full well how to get around this, but it makes me suspicious of what I've downloaded. Would Microsoft have truly missed this?

It is annoying. The preview MSIs are signed but the preview PKGs are not. The last release was so maybe it just takes some time?

BTW you can ctrl-click/right-click the installer package and select open to get the option to run it without fully disabling gatekeeper.

[https://github.com/dotnet/cli/issues/3434]

Post reply on HN