Live data from Hacker News

A book series on JavaScript

github.com

11–20 of 111 posts

Re: A book series on JavaScript

#11
Can the web use a language, simple enough to not need multiple books to allow to understand its mechanics?

As this metaclass / function VS Function / whatever dispatch business is much worse than recently discussed message-passing purism, in its worst forms.

Re: A book series on JavaScript

#13
post #6

I can highly recommend these books. They're one of the only books that do a real deep-dive into the language. I often have to interview people for javascript jobs. It's astonishing how few of them actually get how the `this` keyword, closures, prototypes etc work. So the title of the series may be arrogant, but not wrong.

This is too true. I've had a software engineer complain to me at how unfair his last interview was because they asked "esoteric javascript" questions in a front-end javascript development position.

I asked him what questions he found tricky and a lot of them are really simple javascript 'things' (scopes, closure, iife, etc) that would come up sooner or later when you're working with the language

Re: A book series on JavaScript

#15
post #6

I can highly recommend these books. They're one of the only books that do a real deep-dive into the language. I often have to interview people for javascript jobs. It's astonishing how few of them actually get how the `this` keyword, closures, prototypes etc work. So the title of the series may be arrogant, but not wrong.

Here is my review for JavaScript coding interviews.[0] I should update the REST API section a little since I learned how to use Swagger.

[0]: https://github.com/adam-s/js-interview-review

Re: A book series on JavaScript

#18

I really don't get the arrogant "You don't know X". Maybe I know it, maybe I don't know it. But if I know it already, then I am wasting my time since I think I don't know it (not really). However if I don't know it, then the condescending tone doesn't really motivate me to want to know (while I love to learn about Javascript).

It's just a catchy, challenging title, a la "Learn X The Hard Way" or "X For Dummies".

Re: A book series on JavaScript

#19
post #6

I can highly recommend these books. They're one of the only books that do a real deep-dive into the language. I often have to interview people for javascript jobs. It's astonishing how few of them actually get how the `this` keyword, closures, prototypes etc work. So the title of the series may be arrogant, but not wrong.

Here is my review for JavaScript coding interviews.[0] I should update the REST API section a little since I learned how to use Swagger. [0]: https://github.com/adam-s/js-interview-review

This is a good list! Thanks for the links to Regex Crossword and RegexOne - they look useful.

Re: A book series on JavaScript

#20

If you search Amazon for these titles, you'll see the author reacting poorly to bad reviews.

Someone commented on his free e-book by saying "meh", and he replied:

Note that this review not only is completely unhelpful with just the single word "meh", leaving me nothing as an author to do to improve... but also that this review was from the kindle edition, which is FREE. ChrisP got a free copy of my book -- intentionally offered that way at a loss of income to both me and my publisher -- and took the time to come here and give a one-word, one-star review.

Seems quite reasonable to me really (though perhaps he'd be better off just ignoring that sort of feedback). I didn't spend long searching this so perhaps he's reacted worse elsewhere.

Post reply on HN