Opera battery saver is great but they should enable it automatically whenever you're on battery, as it has no performance impact that I've noticed.
Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
21–30 of 220 posts
Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
And they say "Opera Developer (39.0.2248.0)" - which is presumably a dev build of the browser. Like it would be fine if they say "in next version we will retake the top" or whatever but don't try to dispute their results by providing something they had no way of measuring.
The developer stream is public, and so is the exact build they used[1]. [1] http://get.opera.com/pub/opera-developer/39.0.2248.0/
Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
It wouldn't be too hard to dual-boot Win10 on Apple hardware and compare them, but it might be a little awkward for Microsoft to do so officially.
The OS is a pretty obvious confounding factor, don't you think?
In the end the user does not care which OS runs in the background, just which platform offers the best experience - in this case the longest battery time.
Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#24Opera with an ad blocker vs Edge without it doesn't seem like an ubiased test.
It doesn't. But there's no reason anyone should be running a browser without an ad-blocker in the first place. Edge should have a lightweight ad-blocker built-in by default.
EDIT: Downvotes? Really this is factually accurate:
http://lifehacker.com/windows-10-is-showing-ads-on-your-lock...
Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#25Opera with an ad blocker vs Edge without it doesn't seem like an ubiased test.
Even with the ad blocker being a feature in opera out of the box? They were trying to show that opera can achieve better battery performance based on it's features and optimizations. Does that not include the ad-blocker?
Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#26Definitely not a fair test... Edge was rendering a lot more without an ad-blocker.
You might argue that not rendering ads is a valid method to save battery.
Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#27Opera with an ad blocker vs Edge without it doesn't seem like an ubiased test.
It doesn't. But there's no reason anyone should be running a browser without an ad-blocker in the first place. Edge should have a lightweight ad-blocker built-in by default.
Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#28Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#29Re: Why we challenge Microsoft’s battery test
#30Now that Opera Software is owned by a Chinese company I've avoided their browser anyways, regardless of potential battery/performance benefits.