Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if I register a domain with a shell corp and a straw "contact" who is an employee of Mossack Fonseca (or whatever)? If I want to transfer the domain I just sell the shell corp.
Then you have to pay an extra $50 or $100 a year to maintain your corporation per domain, which reduces the number of domains you can own with a fixed amount of expenses.
If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
101–110 of 118 posts
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#102An idea I've been tossing around: What if domains cost $100 if more than one person wants it? The idea here is to squeeze the squatters with 000s of domains. Whenever I want a domain, most of the ones I want are taken. Not by people who are making use of it, but by people who are squatting in hopes of extorting anyone who would actually use the domain to produce value. I'd actually be happy if Verisign or any other p…
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
> While I am sure the load is high, everytime you look up a .com you are not connecting to Verisign Server. It depends on what's in your resolver cache. If coming from a cold cache, you would start from the root hints file[1] -- if you ask them for an A record for news.ycombinator.com, they give you the NS records for com. ([a-m].gtld-servers.net, and some A and AAAA records for those); these are the Verisign servers…
> if you ask them for an A record for news.ycombinator.com, they give you the NS records for com. Why does it have to go to the .com registry? Why can't the NS servers of the registrar (GoDaddy/Namecheap/etc.) themselves provide that resolution (ycombinator.com == xx.xx.xx.xx IP) ? After all the registrars are assigned for that specific purpose, aren't they? Looks like a centralized bureaucracy to me if each request…
They could. Any name server along the chain could just answer the question if it knew the answer. It's a matter of configuration whether a certain domain is delegated to a different nameserver. And that doesn't end at ycombinator.com. The nameserver for ycombinator.com could delegate subdomains to further nameservers, and so on.
> After all the registrars are assigned for that specific purpose, aren't they?
No, their job is to enter their customers' data into the registry's database, that's it. That is, who the owner of the domain is, and which nameservers it should be delegated to. Some registrars also provide DNS hosting, in which case their customer can choose to have them provide the DNS server that's put into the registry's database for the domain to be delegated to.
Also, the DNS doesn't just map domain names to IP addresses. You can have as many subdomains and hostnames below some domain, each pointing to different IP addresses, and you have other information in the DNS, such as which server is responsible for receiving emails for some domain name.
And in particular, none of this information is necessarily static, or even global. Large websites might have multiple webservers, and when one of them fails, they automatically remove its IP address from their DNS server so the clients only try to use the ones that actually work. Or others run DNS servers that return different IP addresses, depending on which part of the planet the request came from, to direct clients to a server that's geographically close. All of that is only possible because the responsibility is delegated to their own nameserver that they can program to behave however they want.
Also, no, not every request goes to the root servers or the com/net/org servers. Your computer, for example, asks your internet provider's DNS resolver server for any names it needs to look up. Now, your provider's server caches responses. So, if you were to go to ycombinator.com, for example, it wouldn't start at the root again, as is already knows which nameservr is responsible for ycombinator.com, as it has already looked up news.ycombinator.com in order to load this page. So it would ask the nameserver that's responsible for ycombinator.com directly. And that's also the main reason why it's built the way it is: The delegation combined with the caching distributes the load to the many individual name servers of each domain instead of having all the requests hit one central server.
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is the stupidest idea ever. If i have a domain name and if somebody rich wants it, it can take over next year. It hijacking.
How about if that additional revenue from the sale goes to you?
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about if that additional revenue from the sale goes to you?
What if we did the same with names in general? If someone wanted to be brador on HN, and you didn't out-bid them, they were to get your name. Oh, and your real name, too, of course. If someone pays enough, you have to get a new name. And a new telephone number. And a new house. And anything else you own, really. If someone offers more money than you have, you are forced to sell at that price whatever you have. What c…
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#106An idea I've been tossing around: What if domains cost $100 if more than one person wants it? The idea here is to squeeze the squatters with 000s of domains. Whenever I want a domain, most of the ones I want are taken. Not by people who are making use of it, but by people who are squatting in hopes of extorting anyone who would actually use the domain to produce value. I'd actually be happy if Verisign or any other p…
How is this possible with so many TLDs? Or do you mean "whenever I want a .com domain"?
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#107An idea I've been tossing around: What if domains cost $100 if more than one person wants it? The idea here is to squeeze the squatters with 000s of domains. Whenever I want a domain, most of the ones I want are taken. Not by people who are making use of it, but by people who are squatting in hopes of extorting anyone who would actually use the domain to produce value. I'd actually be happy if Verisign or any other p…
I'll give you the names you want for free. But you have to change your DNS settings to point to my cache servers. Or follow my instructions how to set up your own root and cache and/or auth nameservers.
If I'm understanding it correctly you will be faking nameserver entries ?
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's still being squatted. I own other TLDs for it we can operate the site off of. I'm hoping eventually they abandon the domain, since it's unlikely anyone else will want it.
Did you try complaining to ICANN about it via any means? An alternative is to throw a DMCA on them through Google, that's much faster (though its intended use is reporting of copyright violations, not sure how it'll work for reporting of squatting of domain names).
Re: If ICANN only charges 18¢ per domain name, why am I paying $10? (2014)
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Coase theorem says that shouldn't make a difference.
Coase theorem applies if there are a) zero or sufficiently low transaction costs and b) if parties are able to bargain. If domains have to be returned back to the registrar b) doesn't apply. Auctions ensure that a) doesn't apply either. Furthermore, adding a 7 day waiting period before returned domains become available will further ensure that parties cannot trade domains between each other but must purchase from the…
People have crowdfunded worse things.