Live data from Hacker News

OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

techcrunch.com

511–520 of 578 posts

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#511

Can I swipe someone's phone, walk over to their Mac, and have it unlock? Or is there something else going on that doesn't make this a really bad idea?

You mean like, the cops, FBI, or TSA take your iphone, put it close to your laptop, and then have access to everything, probably including your encrypted hard drive?

Yeah, I'd say that's a pretty bad idea.

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#512

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Streaming is available in Safari and through the WWDC app." ...is nobody else getting this message? Or am I just the only one who thinks this is bullshit? Here is a direct link to the mp4: http://devstreaming.apple.com/videos/wwdc/2016/102w0bsn0ge83...

Apple's been using HTTP live streaming for a few years; to date, nobody else fully supports it (although Edge has some limited support). Twitch also has HTTPLS support; you can watch their streams in Safari without Flash installed.

You can also open the HLS streams with VLC

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#513
post #244
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair (regarding "closed tech"), Apple was hardly the only one to release a propriety Vulkan alternative (there's also Mantle and DX12) and Apple released Metal to developers almost two years before Vulkan 1.0 was released.

Vulkan is based on Mantle, and DX12 can coexist with Vulkan because Microsoft doesn't take responsibility for all of Windows' OpenGL and Vulkan support. In this area at least, Apple really is doubling down on proprietary technology where others aren't so much.

One aspect of their decision to run with Metal that surprises me, is that they decided the cost of developing and maintaining an API of that level of complexity was worth it. I'd like to know what they were thinking.

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#514
post #481

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You were downvoted for being wrong. And now you're being downvoted again because you're whining about it, instead of just admitting that you were wrong. I see about as many people complaining that HN irrationally loves Apple as that it irrationally hates Apple. Neither one is true. Mostly HN downvotes people who don't check their facts.

I never said that you have to attend physically. See my comment below. "Whining about it". Please avoid personal attacks.

Little bit over sensitive, aren't we?

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#515
post #491

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you also have an associated Gmail account it won't let you use another email address as the primary one. That said I'm in some apple limbo land where I need to switch to an email address for iCloud but it won't let me use mine since I had a pre-email appleID. Yay.

What do you mean by primary? You can't change your "username", but you can set it to send all correspondence, recovery, etc, to your non-gmail address.

I guess I mean the username. It was previously my@email.com but now it's an ugly user.gtalkfix@gmail.com in all the Google UI.

Oh well, I avoid logging in anyway :)

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#516
post #273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As someone who has used Windows, Mac and Linux as both personal and work OS for > 5 years each, I'm curious to know how come (you don't see yourself getting one in the future). The two things I have against the Apple platform compared to Microsoft and Google are Apple's bias toward lock-in and their aversion to tinkering. Other than that, I think what they are offering is rather good.

I got a Macbook Pro as work machine in late 2014, having used a Thinkpad before. 1. Mac OS is just too unfamiliar. It starts with the keyboard layout, which I reverted to Windows-style after I went crazy trying to find the square brackets. (Which, probably for aesthetics, they didn't bother to print ont he keyboard.) 2. Mac OS's poor multi-monitor support regularly drives me crazy. To their credit, they have ironed o…

> 3. The userland is UNIX, but does not match my expectations well enough. It's basically in the creepy valley. For example, I was using units(1) one day and wondering why it gave a syntax error when I tried to use a power operator (like "2^64"). Then I noticed that I was in the Mac terminal, not in my Linux VM (where I usually work), and upon inspecting the manpage, I found that they hadn't updated their units(1) since 1991 (wtf).

That's an interesting one. OS X has a BSD user land (FreeBSD to be specific), while Linux is traditionally used with the GNU user land. Looking at the FreeBSD site, they ship the same units version from 1993: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=units&sektion=1

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#517
post #392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems phrased in the particularly Apple-y style that usually means "we're seeing whether we're allowed to throw this legacy feature away or whether something will force us to put support for it back in."

More accurately: "we still need to see how badly this breaks Photoshop and iTunes or their builds."

Years ago, I used HFSX on my machine but I don't remember that iTunes broke because of that. A lot of other things broke though.

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#518
post #357
post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They cover things like this in the "Developer State of the Union" which is the talk really focused at developers. That's later today.

"Developer State of the Union", Jesus... you talk about a closed platform. I've never been able to stand these ecosystems where you need to attend state of the unions to know what will be deprecated and how the "establishment" has decided you would run your business (tools, etc...). I know there's good money to be made there but Apple is just too much for me.

If it's any consolation, I've been downvoted a bunch of times when I tell stories about my time working for Steve at NeXT. People just don't seem to like hearing things that disagree with whatever perspective they hold. (And Steve used to refer to our software as the "crown jewels" that needed to be kept secret at any cost - even if we lost business or bankrupted partners. Steve freely admitted that we would overcharge anybody who was naive enough to pay high prices. But people don't like to hear that - even though I was in many meetings with Steve where he said those things.) And I should add that I'm not anti-Apple. I think we need to be able to see people and companies clearly - warts and all. Otherwise, how can we react to the real world?

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#519
post #317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That Apple doesn't do quality anymore? For Mac OS, system bugs are increasing release after release, kernel panics were introduced in Mavericks and didn't go away with El Capitan even though it was supposed to be a bugfix-centric release. I also have deactivated upgrades.

Are you sure this isn't a hardware problem? I've been running El Capitan on really quite unsupported hardware (Skylake K6700 / Samsung 950 Pro SSD) and haven't had a single kernel panic – nor on the Macbook Pro. Also if you're looking for quality (opposed to freedom or configurability) Linux on the Desktop really doesn't fit. I adore it on the server, but there isn't a distribution/hardware combination where essentia…

I'm absolutely certain it isn't hardware: It started to happen the same week I upgraded to Mavericks. Besides, it's a Macbook Pro 2013. I had noticed several comments on HN about kernel panics in Mavericks, I didn't want to give them credit when I upgraded.

As you note: I reckon Linux isn't much better. I switched to Mac when Ubuntu dropped a bugfix for Ethernet encryption in 13.04 which prevented me from working for my employer (and reduced mouse controls in the UI since 12.04).

I'd pay $200/yr for a maintained OS.

Re: OS X is now macOS and gets support for Siri, auto unlock

#520
post #393
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair (regarding "closed tech"), Apple was hardly the only one to release a propriety Vulkan alternative (there's also Mantle and DX12) and Apple released Metal to developers almost two years before Vulkan 1.0 was released.

Basically making it like OSX's implementation of EFI vs. UEFI, or their Lightning cables vs. USB-C: 1. Apple creates their own implementation of something and pushes the industry forward; 2. Everyone else realizes it's a good idea, and standardizes on something slightly different/incompatible (usually with Apple on the standards committee!); 3. Apple continue using their own thing that Works For Them rather than adop…

The closest Apple ever got to making a standard was 1394, but even then, other companies were behind it (and thus the famous story about Jobs wanting to charge for 1394 until he found out Apple would be paying a fortune to other companies).

EFI was made by Intel and UEFI was basically EFI 2.0.

Thunderbolt was made by intel (lightning was a cheaper spec from AMD that didn't require expensive active cables). USB-mini breaks and displayport mini is big. What we got instead was USB-C which unifies both of them. Thunderbolt used displayport mini, but the latest 3.0 spec uses USB-C. The fact that all three technologies are starting to unify on the same connector is very beneficial and none of this is dislike for Apple.

Likewise, AMD made the mantle APIs for lower-level work and then turned them over to Kronos where they became the basis of Vulcan. Apple's metal API and doubling down by leaving the Vulcan work group is either "not invented here" or vendor lock-in.

Post reply on HN