Live data from Hacker News

Google endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership

publicpolicy.googleblog.com

11–20 of 260 posts

Re: Google endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership

#11
post #6

Its always funny when people naively forget that Google, Apple, etc. are megacorps, not some startup ventures. They are the man. This endorsement doesn't surprise me one bit.

Is this a satirical comment or are you actually using the word "megacorps" seriously? Just because a company is big doesn't mean it is nefarious. You should explain why these companies are evil and how them endorsing TPP is a bad thing.

Re: Google endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership

#13
post #6

Its always funny when people naively forget that Google, Apple, etc. are megacorps, not some startup ventures. They are the man. This endorsement doesn't surprise me one bit.

Ah, but Google often does the things it knows people aren't going to like behind closed doors. (For instance, Google's control over Android is done via confidential agreements. The public hasn't seen a version of these agreements newer than 2011.) An open, public endorsement of something that most tech enthusiasts who use their products know is a bad thing, is a very surprising move. I'm pretty sure I've seen a numbe…

>most everyone who uses their products knows is a bad thing

I very much doubt most of their users could even tell you what it stood for, let alone have an opinion on its value.

Re: Google endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership

#14

Wow. Even as the resident Google critic, I never expected Google would sink down to the level of endorsing the TPP. :/ This is a clear break from the EFF's position ( https://www.eff.org/issues/tpp ) and a strong indication of their increasing closed door ties with the Obama administration.

> a strong indication of their increasing closed door ties with the Obama administration. This is what I want when I grow up. I want this power.

Ods are you won't get it, just will be on the bad side of the deal, being oppressed instead of opressing others.

Re: Google endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership

#15
post #12
post #4

> prohibits [participating countries] from requiring local storage of data > It prohibits discrimination against foreign Internet services As a Dutchman I can see why Google likes this.

TTIP and TPP are two different trade agreements.

Woops, my mistake. Edited s/TTIP/this/.

Re: Google endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership

#17
If these benefits are legitimate, why can't they focus on 5 or 10 specific objectives, and write them in some concise form like the Bill of Rights? Why does it need to be 2,000 pages and full of complex, obsfucated concepts and details?

Is the only way for progress to happen?

And even if the TPP is completely beneficial, it is still part of the philosophy of economic integration. Which at its heart is promoting the centralization of power and the diminishment of classical liberalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_integration#Stages

Re: Google endorses the Trans-Pacific Partnership

#19
post #15
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

TTIP and TPP are two different trade agreements.

Woops, my mistake. Edited s/TTIP/this/.

There are 3 agreements being negotiated TPP, TTIP & TiSA to set the economic structure of the world by US.
Post reply on HN