Live data from Hacker News

Ruin My Search History

ruinmysearchhistory.com

171–180 of 211 posts

Re: Ruin My Search History

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why don't people just visit in incognito mode in the first place?

I google things I don't want in my history in incognito mode. The question is: does it prevent being tracked by Google?

i do that too but i'm pretty sure my browser and my isp send enough information to google to perfectly identify me.

Re: Ruin My Search History

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It also occurs if you cotinually tweak a single search term, for example adding more and more exclusions to try to bypass Google's 'suggestions'. I encounter it about once a month.

Yeah, I get it a couple of times a week when I try to search for old technical stuff, where google constantly reformulates my search and includes what it thinks are synonyms.

Google has some kind of "verbatim mode" which usually works better for technical stuff. (Search tools -> All results –> Verbatim)

Re: Ruin My Search History

#174
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm rusty but, como votar por Trump si __seas__ Mexicano ? Or is the eres Mexican, too?

If you are indeed Mexican, the subjunctive shouldn’t apply anymore, as there is no doubt/speculation/hope involved. (Caveat: Non-native and also a bit rusty)

What you mean is "si fueras mexicano". "si seas" is just wrong.

Re: Ruin My Search History

#175
post #166
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do people actually use Google Search while being logged-in in Google?

Absolutely! The saved search history is incredibly useful for shaping and filtering search results to make them more targeted and helpful. I also see more relevant adverts, and less generic ones, which makes them much less annoying. People of a certain technical mindset have a knee-jerk "Privacy! Surveillance! Evil!" response, tuned to the worst possible world type of scenario, where the rest of the Internet is popul…

> the majority of the rest are trying to provide useful services to improve their users lives

And if the ads or results on subjects you're interested in just happen to take a line against what you personally believe on the subject, and instead happen to tout an agenda that benefits the (right-wing/capitalist/US-centric) corporate or political interests of Google and FB and the like, is it still just about improving your life?

Re: Ruin My Search History

#176
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are indeed correct. a is Spanish Spanish por is Mexican Spanish

I'm rusty but, como votar por Trump si __seas__ Mexicano ? Or is the eres Mexican, too?

"fueras/fueses" would be the right verb form, but that would be equivalent to "How to vote for Trump if you WERE Mexican" as opposed to "How to vote for Trump if you ARE Mexican".

Re: Ruin My Search History

#179

They should have left out the gay stuff. Might have potential to stir up a heterosexual relationship, but makes it look like it's a bad thing on it's own.

Or when you consider that most people in a relationship are in a heterosexual relationship, you target a lot of people.

Re: Ruin My Search History

#180
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I should really start a website that lets people bid for each other's votes online.

I believe you'd make a killing, but I'm not sure it would be legal (and if so, I'm pretty sure they'll put a stop to it asap).

Vote buying and selling is election fraud per 18 U.S. Code § 597 [1]. In fact, it's not even legal to make the offer, in either direction:

"Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and

Whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/597

Post reply on HN