Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually, no - a hospital emergency room in the US has to provide you any needed medical care - full stop.
Interesting- do you have a source for this? Everything I have found states otherwise- for example- https://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/ph/rpt/2003-R-0621.htm
If no-one helps you after a car crash in India, this is why
221–225 of 225 posts
Re: If no-one helps you after a car crash in India, this is why
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting- do you have a source for this? Everything I have found states otherwise- for example- https://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/olrdata/ph/rpt/2003-R-0621.htm
It's important to understand the difference between "any medical care you want" and "any emergency medical care you need". Emergency is the key word there, and it's generally applied in a fairly common sense way. (When it comes to payment things are far more screwed up in the US, but for "not denying care" it's pretty straightforward.)
That is what I was replying to in the immediate parent comment.
As to your comment- even if the hospitals definition of emergency is generally 'common sense', it may differ from ones expectations. Further, it seems (I may be wrong) that emergency rooms are given a great deal of leeway especially in edge cases that may not be general, but probably occur more often than one might expect.
Re: If no-one helps you after a car crash in India, this is why
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh? What rubbish! It has nothing to do with race. In India we do have a caste system but even with that you won't be able to look at an injured person and get to know his/her caste.
Being able to know someone's caste has nothing to do with it. It's the willingness to see someone else as an "other" rather than part of your own group that allows you to dehumanize them. The caste system teaches people to become desensitized to the suffering of those around them, which is a precondition for the behavior described in the article.
Re: If no-one helps you after a car crash in India, this is why
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh? What rubbish! It has nothing to do with race. In India we do have a caste system but even with that you won't be able to look at an injured person and get to know his/her caste.
Being able to know someone's caste has nothing to do with it. It's the willingness to see someone else as an "other" rather than part of your own group that allows you to dehumanize them. The caste system teaches people to become desensitized to the suffering of those around them, which is a precondition for the behavior described in the article.
Or are they conveniently becoming desensitized when only a person/family meets with an accident?
Don't you see how ridiculous your statement sounds now?
Re: If no-one helps you after a car crash in India, this is why
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being able to know someone's caste has nothing to do with it. It's the willingness to see someone else as an "other" rather than part of your own group that allows you to dehumanize them. The caste system teaches people to become desensitized to the suffering of those around them, which is a precondition for the behavior described in the article.
If the caste system teaches people to become desensitized to the suffering of those around them why do the same people go en-masse to rescue the so called "others" when a natural tragedy or terror strike takes place in India? Do they suddenly forget the "teachings" of the so called "caste system"? Or are they conveniently becoming desensitized when only a person/family meets with an accident? Don't you see how ridicu…
Or look at it in reverse...have you ever traveled to a far off place and met someone who was from, say, your home state/province? Back at home, you'd feel very little connection with them since the live in a different city from you and you're surrounded by people in your city whom you feel closer to. But meet that same person half-way around the world and suddenly you feel closer to them. They're now more part of your tribe than those around you.
We're tribal animals, by nature, and our capacity to help and tolerate the suffering of those we consider to be in our tribe is significantly different from those outside our tribe. If aliens invaded, you'd see almost all racism and human conflict disappear almost overnight. We'd become a human tribe struggling against an alien "other". But absent that, we'll continue to subconsciously divide ourselves along tribal boundaries. In your rabid defense of India from what you perceive is an attack on one of its customs, you're perceiving me to be an "other" to the Indian tribe.
This is well established human psychology. My point was that the caste system is divisive, by it's very nature and purpose. According to our understanding of the human capacity for experiencing the suffering of others, anything that divides us in any capacity can only increase the kind of unfeeling behavior described in the article.
And you need look no farther than India to see the exact opposite type of force. How many devout Buddhists would stand by idly as someone in a car crash lay dying? The Buddha realized (warning: ridiculous oversimplification approaching) that our sense of self is an illusion and we're all one...there is no "other." When viewed through that lens, what is the hassle of being dragged into and administrative mess or needing to pay for hospital care when compared to the suffering of a dying person? A Buddhist would jump in to help without even the slightest regard for the consequences that would result.