Can't help wondering... Will the next major version be macOS 1.0?
“OS X” renamed to “macOS”
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: “OS X” renamed to “macOS”
#12Re: “OS X” renamed to “macOS”
#13 The ability to earn 85% takes effect in June 2016 for
subscription renewals occurring after that date. iOS, OS X,
tvOS and watchOS apps are eligible.
http://itunespartner.apple.com/en/apps/faq/In-App%20Purchase...Re: “OS X” renamed to “macOS”
#14I think it's an overdue change -- the 'X' hasn't made much sense for a long time. That said, I hate the leading lowercase. I realise that 'MacOS' wouldn't be in keeping with the pattern of 'iOS' and 'tvOS', but it's much less awkward and ugly.
Re: “OS X” renamed to “macOS”
#15Looks like it was just a typo. The text has been amended. It now reads, The ability to earn 85% takes effect in June 2016 for subscription renewals occurring after that date. iOS, OS X, tvOS and watchOS apps are eligible. http://itunespartner.apple.com/en/apps/faq/In-App%20Purchase...
Accidentally writing "macOS" instead of "OS X" seems a bit extreme to me, but maybe it's possible.
Re: “OS X” renamed to “macOS”
#16I think it's an overdue change -- the 'X' hasn't made much sense for a long time. That said, I hate the leading lowercase. I realise that 'MacOS' wouldn't be in keeping with the pattern of 'iOS' and 'tvOS', but it's much less awkward and ugly.
Re: “OS X” renamed to “macOS”
#17Looks like it was just a typo. The text has been amended. It now reads, The ability to earn 85% takes effect in June 2016 for subscription renewals occurring after that date. iOS, OS X, tvOS and watchOS apps are eligible. http://itunespartner.apple.com/en/apps/faq/In-App%20Purchase...
A typo that was a pure mistake, or a typo that was accidentally leaking the new name before it was time? Accidentally writing "macOS" instead of "OS X" seems a bit extreme to me, but maybe it's possible.
Re: “OS X” renamed to “macOS”
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps macOS 11.0 is coming this fall.
I wonder if they will converge on version numbers with iOS.
It's strange to have such different versioning conventions, especially since OS X has been tied on to iOS's annual release schedule for years now. And Apple won't get another chance like this to seamlessly bring the version numbers into alignment.