Live data from Hacker News

Secure Hardware and Open Source: An Alternative to Java Card

medium.com

1–10 of 22 posts

Re: Secure Hardware and Open Source: An Alternative to Java Card

#4
Here is a fully open secure hardware device:

https://sc4.us/hsm/

(Please don't submit this link to HN. I want to stay somewhat stealthy until I've had a chance to write an introductory article.)

At the moment it's only a prototype. I have done a very small production run, so if you want one to experiment with, contact me. I'm planning on doing a kickstarter to fund a real production run.

Re: Secure Hardware and Open Source: An Alternative to Java Card

#8
post #4

Here is a fully open secure hardware device: https://sc4.us/hsm/ (Please don't submit this link to HN. I want to stay somewhat stealthy until I've had a chance to write an introductory article.) At the moment it's only a prototype. I have done a very small production run, so if you want one to experiment with, contact me. I'm planning on doing a kickstarter to fund a real production run.

One thing that seems to be missing from your project is the actual "HSM-ness". Things like side channels and so probably are not relevant to the target market, but some kind of assurance that device's firmware was not tampered with is probably required.

Re: Secure Hardware and Open Source: An Alternative to Java Card

#10
post #5

So what measures does this "secure" C alternative offer against memory corruption to be positioned as better option than Java Card?!

It's based on public ARM specifications (MPU + service calls) so the attack surface is way smaller compared to a virtual machine and the performance is of course way better. Applications can still corrupt their own memory space temporarily (not rewrite their code) but can't touch other applications or the Operating System.
Post reply on HN