Live data from Hacker News

Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

duffy.house.gov

21–30 of 101 posts

Re: Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

#21
post #20

"The Protecting Internet Freedom Act would also ensure that the United States maintains sole ownership of the .gov and .mil top-level domains, which are vital to national security." I almost did a spit take...

I agree with this. I like being able to know that a site is trustworthy based on it having a .gov domain name.

Agree, I have no problem with this. By not limiting these to government uses and ownership, you are only opening the door for malicious websites to fool users...

Re: Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

#23
post #20

"The Protecting Internet Freedom Act would also ensure that the United States maintains sole ownership of the .gov and .mil top-level domains, which are vital to national security." I almost did a spit take...

I agree with this. I like being able to know that a site is trustworthy based on it having a .gov domain name.

I mean... do you really want to have to guess whether congress.gov is run by the government, or some random country which decided to sell of .gov TLDs for extra cash?

Or, potentially more deceptively to consumers, "healthcare.gov", etc.

Re: Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

#25

As an international user, it is in my opinion fantastic that the White House is attempting to cede control of key internet infrastructure. Why should a single country act as the custodians of a global service?

Well, it's ours. We created it. We've allowed other countries to use it because it benefits us to do so.

I realize this is probably not the popular opinion, but I'm not sure it makes any sense really to give up control over it.

Re: Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

#26

As an international user, it is in my opinion fantastic that the White House is attempting to cede control of key internet infrastructure. Why should a single country act as the custodians of a global service?

Because it's ours. We were just were kind enough to let you use it.

Re: Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

#27
post #25

As an international user, it is in my opinion fantastic that the White House is attempting to cede control of key internet infrastructure. Why should a single country act as the custodians of a global service?

Well, it's ours. We created it. We've allowed other countries to use it because it benefits us to do so. I realize this is probably not the popular opinion, but I'm not sure it makes any sense really to give up control over it.

Also, they have a point about the free speech. For a system in which free speech is indispensable (the internet), there is actually only a handful of countries that seem to get the whole "free speech" thing correct, the US among them.

Re: Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

#28
post #25

As an international user, it is in my opinion fantastic that the White House is attempting to cede control of key internet infrastructure. Why should a single country act as the custodians of a global service?

Well, it's ours. We created it. We've allowed other countries to use it because it benefits us to do so. I realize this is probably not the popular opinion, but I'm not sure it makes any sense really to give up control over it.

I see that more of a historical artifact. It's not like all the servers in the world are in the US and everyone else gets their internet through big pipes from your shores.

Re: Duffy and Cruz Introduce the Protecting Internet Freedom Act

#29
post #28
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it's ours. We created it. We've allowed other countries to use it because it benefits us to do so. I realize this is probably not the popular opinion, but I'm not sure it makes any sense really to give up control over it.

I see that more of a historical artifact. It's not like all the servers in the world are in the US and everyone else gets their internet through big pipes from your shores.

You can see it however you want :). You're also free to set up your own DNS if you prefer; we don't assert any control over the design, just our implementation.
Post reply on HN