Live data from Hacker News

This is not a place of honor

wipp.energy.gov

11–20 of 287 posts

Re: This is not a place of honor

#11
post #6

It appears that most of the images are missing (there are figures that are refereed to but do not exist). Is there a complete copy somewhere? edit: found a mirror http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/1992/92138...

They show up for me. Here's an imgur album.

http://imgur.com/a/DGizu

Re: This is not a place of honor

#12
Funny stuff. A product of the narrative of the day, and in less that 30 years its already changed. Of course there will be no nuclear waste in the future, that stuff is way to valuable as fuel in modern reactors.

Re: This is not a place of honor

#14
post #11
post #6

It appears that most of the images are missing (there are figures that are refereed to but do not exist). Is there a complete copy somewhere? edit: found a mirror http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/1992/92138...

They show up for me. Here's an imgur album. http://imgur.com/a/DGizu

I see those images, but there are more that are missing. For example: Figure 4.3-18, which is referenced 2 times in text but has no accompanying picture.

Re: This is not a place of honor

#15
We should just assume that nuclear waste lasts forever, like a lot of chemical waste does, and then treat it the same as the equivalent class of chemical waste. When someone says "10,000 years", people start thinking about how to wait it out. When someone says "forever", people give up on waiting it out, and start thinking about more realistic safety measures.

Re: This is not a place of honor

#16
post #8

See also Into Eternity, a movie about how the Finns are dealing with this, with a 100,000 year timeframe. http://www.intoeternitythemovie.com/

It is a very good documentary on the subject. For me it really drove home the idea that current nuclear power comes with too expensive externalities in the form of "keep this stuff safe for 100 000 years". We've never come close to doing something like that as a species. I don't think we ever will.

Re: This is not a place of honor

#17
It's a fascinating problem, a way to communicate the concept that this is not a treasure trove, not a historical site, but something dangerous that was meant to be sealed away for many thousands of years due to its hazardous nature. The parting thoughts seem most telling to me thought.

They wonder if this really worth it, since in the end coming into contact with the waste is a bit of a self-limiting problem, in that people exploring will become sick and die. It will ergo, become a "Place to avoid" anyway. If the cost is bound to be a few explorer's lives every few millennia in any case, and that's what will send the real message, then... well... you see?

Finally though, they just wonder how to construct something massive, durable, and yet not likely to be cannibalized for parts or scrap! They even raise the issue of what 400+ generations of unknowable humanity might do to the marker structure, without disturbing the rest of the site.

Re: This is not a place of honor

#18

I would have thought that to an advanced civilization that a nuclear radioactive waste dump may well be of value. I do think worrying about radioactive waste given how much carbon dioxide we have dumped into the atmosphere is a bit like bandaging a stubbed toe on an amputated leg.

>to an advanced civilization that a nuclear radioactive waste dump may well be of value.

Actually it has value to our civilization, because much of the low-grade uranium "waste" could be put into breeder reactors and turned into plutonium - and reused as nuclear fuel.

Read about it here: https://www.withouthotair.com/c24/page_163.shtml

Re: This is not a place of honor

#19
post #3

If their goal was to create a hokey-sounding quasi-spiritual ward that future generations will consider naive and ignore, they've certainly hit the nail on the head. Probably a better approach is to accept the fact that nuclear waste will either be cleaned up or destroy humanity long before ten thousand years comes to pass, and spend the money they spent on this exercise in speculative fiction instead on working towa…

Admittedly, I haven't read the article, but the tone of the message suggests that it's not meant for future generations of our civilization, but for future generations of whatever cultures come after our civilization is gone.

There's a pretty remarkable old English poem that survived from Dark Ages Britain, in which the author marvels at the ruins of Roman Britain, wondering what giants must have once inhabited the land in order to build such things. From the sounds of it, these markers are targeted towards people like that, not our own immediate descendents who will already know it's a nuclear waste site.

Re: This is not a place of honor

#20
post #2

Holy shit. Dieter Ast was my landlord in college. This explains so much about my basement. To those who haven't read the article yet, the real title is Judgment on Markers to Deter Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Prof Ast was the material scientist on one of the multidisciplinary teams tasked to design warning symbols for 10,000 year nuclear waste storage sites. He used to go around…

… your basement was plastered with iconographic warnings against entering due to interminable life-ending substances contained within?

did you enter?

Post reply on HN