101–110 of 125 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://github.com/18F/chat Seems like the Slack invite app is not deployed to cloud.gov right now.
It's down for some internal IT reasons, but should be back up at some point soon (but not this weekend).
contact us on {masterminditservices@gmail.com}. or +1(205) 900-9736
Below is a list of some of some services we offer Mobile Hacking, email, Social Media Hack, School grades changing, Clearing of criminal records, Password sniffing, Bank Transfers and Company Money-Wire services, Cyber Security, Computer Security, SMTP Any domain, Cpanel, Unlimited, Shell, RDP, Leads, Cpanel, fulls, EIN, Pin, W2, SSN, DOB, fulls for Loans, Mystery shopper, Assistant BOS, Any Country Leads, Location detecting, SQL DB penetration, Penetration testing, Software testing, Database Penetration, Website Ransoming etc
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For what it's worth, I applied to work with 18F late last year. I'm a web developer with a wide array of skills - front-end, back-end, and even UI/UX design, product design, and some marketing and management - with about 8 years of experience, mostly doing independent consulting with a couple years at a SF startup in there. I'm also very civic minded, doing a bunch of pro-bono work and (since) getting involved in com…
If your in it for the mission, not the money consider applying as a Code For America fellow: https://www.codeforamerica.org/do-something/work-with-us There are a lot of cities that could use your help. I am in no way connected with them but am a huge fan of their mission.
The focus really needs to be on building a process to better integrate private cloud services and gov't applications. I mean they already are for the most part: https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/fedramp/
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/TrustCenter/Compliance/FedRA...
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160229005262/en/Serv...
Seriously this is just another wasteful program. The Gov't and 18F will hype it up, but don't be fooled.
I'm the product lead on cloud.gov... Thanks for noticing us! There are other Cloud Foundry deployments, but what makes cloud.gov special is the focus on ensuring federal agencies are actually able to use it. Federal compliance for a cloud service provider is a tough bar to clear, and without it most agencies are simply unable to take advantage of capabilities the rest of the world now takes for granted. That in turn…
A major argument in favor of PACER is its high-availability. Hopefully this makes it easier to build a better system with the same high-availability but a much better UX.
As someone who develops for a Gov't agency, this is the wrong move. So much money has been spent on mimicking the private sector innovators. Millions and millions of tax dollars spent on these type of projects. The focus really needs to be on building a process to better integrate private cloud services and gov't applications. I mean they already are for the most part: https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/fedramp/ https…
They're using open source Cloud Foundry, literally to avoid spending millions of dollars mimicking the private sector innovators.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If your in it for the mission, not the money consider applying as a Code For America fellow: https://www.codeforamerica.org/do-something/work-with-us There are a lot of cities that could use your help. I am in no way connected with them but am a huge fan of their mission.
I would do it, but why do they have to base you in SF? You should be able to stay local to where you are actually helping.
I'm the product lead on cloud.gov... Thanks for noticing us! There are other Cloud Foundry deployments, but what makes cloud.gov special is the focus on ensuring federal agencies are actually able to use it. Federal compliance for a cloud service provider is a tough bar to clear, and without it most agencies are simply unable to take advantage of capabilities the rest of the world now takes for granted. That in turn…
This is totally a minor thing, but I feel like the icons halfway down the page are off-by-one: http://i.imgur.com/bXTZqOZ.png That is, the arrowbox thingie for scalability, the lock for security, etc?
As someone who develops for a Gov't agency, this is the wrong move. So much money has been spent on mimicking the private sector innovators. Millions and millions of tax dollars spent on these type of projects. The focus really needs to be on building a process to better integrate private cloud services and gov't applications. I mean they already are for the most part: https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/fedramp/ https…
We also leverage the fact that AWS GovCloud already has FedRAMP status as an IaaS to accelerate our delivery of cloud.gov (which sits on top of it), so we're piggy-backing on the money and effort already spent and eliminating the millions we would otherwise spend by having the government run the IaaS layer.
In other words...
> The focus really needs to be on building a process to better integrate private cloud services and gov't applications.
...that's what we're doing!