Live data from Hacker News

GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

zdnet.com

11–20 of 31 posts

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

while their opponents were a bunch of overpaid nobodies who hated their jobs and overall really didn't care Every sysadmin I've met cares a lot. But they get to rely on products from disparate vendors that are full of zero day exploits and helpful users who are easily socially engineered.

I've known many admins that truly don't give a shit. I've met many incompetent admins as well. Like anyone, they come in many flavors.

Like Pepperjack? :o)

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

while their opponents were a bunch of overpaid nobodies who hated their jobs and overall really didn't care Every sysadmin I've met cares a lot. But they get to rely on products from disparate vendors that are full of zero day exploits and helpful users who are easily socially engineered.

I've known many admins that truly don't give a shit. I've met many incompetent admins as well. Like anyone, they come in many flavors.

Yeah, I read the article and a lot of these were on open accounts with no password required. The most charitable read is they're trying security through obscurity.

I wonder if any of them have heard of VNC Roulette.

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#13

The most interesting thing to me was the evidence posted that other hackers had already penetrated these systems, which I guess goes without saying when you have little to no security in place. Many many years ago when I was younger and playing with buffer overflows and learning shellcode, I'm not saying that I'm proud of this either, but in my journeys I had breached a couple of online retailers, had full access to…

"I encountered files from 'hackers' just saying that they were here or what have you."

Okay, we need proof that we were here... Okay, garbage, give me garbage.

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#14
> The size of the downloadable cache alone puts it at one of the largest breaches this year -- but it could have been far larger, given time and resources.

> "The worst part is that this is barely a fraction of what I could get my hands on," the hacker said.

So why didn't GhostShell release everything he could get his hands on?

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#15
post #8

The most interesting thing to me was the evidence posted that other hackers had already penetrated these systems, which I guess goes without saying when you have little to no security in place. Many many years ago when I was younger and playing with buffer overflows and learning shellcode, I'm not saying that I'm proud of this either, but in my journeys I had breached a couple of online retailers, had full access to…

>I'm reminded of something I read posted by l0pht, way back when, and they just said how much better they were than everyone else because they had jobs at burger king and were dedicated to spending all of their time penetrating networks while their opponents were a bunch of overpaid nobodies who hated their jobs and overall really didn't care, and that they would always win. >I think that still holds true today. This…

>This'll sound a little harsh, but if you have to work at burger king to fund your living then you aren't a very good hacker.

>There's no lack of opportunities for those with talent.

I read it more like "We choose to lead a meager lifestyle -- even with our tremendous abilities -- because working for someone would direct our efforts towards their goals rather than allowing us to pursue our own novel research which is fueled purely by passion for the subject."

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#16
post #14

> The size of the downloadable cache alone puts it at one of the largest breaches this year -- but it could have been far larger, given time and resources. > "The worst part is that this is barely a fraction of what I could get my hands on," the hacker said. So why didn't GhostShell release everything he could get his hands on?

Because he didn't bother. His POC is more than enough.

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#18
post #14

> The size of the downloadable cache alone puts it at one of the largest breaches this year -- but it could have been far larger, given time and resources. > "The worst part is that this is barely a fraction of what I could get my hands on," the hacker said. So why didn't GhostShell release everything he could get his hands on?

Presumably because GhostShell didn't want to leak every bit of accessible data, but merely a subset to illustrate that this wasn't hot air, and shame parties involved into action.

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#19

MongoDB

"NoSQL, or rather NoAuthentication, has been a huge gift to the hacker community. Just when I was worried that they'd finally patched all of the authentication bypass bugs in MySQL, new databases came into style that lack authentication by design"

https://ghostbin.com/paste/6kho7

Re: GhostShell hacker leaks 39M accounts in security “protest”

#20
What happened to hacker ethics? Screw over 39 million people to protest the sorry state of the security of a service they have been using?

Back in the good old days one would have secured the systems instead of harming the victims again.

GhostShell, please stay away from IoT or connected medical devices, I'm afraid you'll kill people just to make a point every security professional already understands.

Post reply on HN