Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see it the opposite way. Using Messenge could give you a great way to use facebook without subjecting yourself to the News Feed Giant Tentacled Monster. Why not use Messenger without Facebook? My reason not to use Facebook was because it trivializes friendships. With Facebook, I wouldn't have to go out of my way to be "friends" with someone, so the relationship would be less meaningful. But Messenger doesn't share…
I'm just gonna go ahead and mention [messenger.com]( https://www.messenger.com/ ) for anyone who agrees with you and doesn't know about it. It's essentially the messenger app in the browser, so you can access your Facebook messages without even coming across the news feed, any ads, etc.
Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
431–440 of 517 posts
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#432Honestly, I just use Messenger without Facebok, since the IM part is the only thing I'd need on the road.
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#433So much complaining. The web app version is crap, of course they want to move people over to the app. Why waste resources on an inferior web version when they can focus their attention on the very successful mobile app. Its just good business sense and seeing that 99.9999999999% of Facebook users already have Messenger installed, its a non issue.
The web app version has a whole lot of features that the installed app doesn't: * It takes up zero phone memory. Yes, this is still an issue on really cheap Android phones. [0] * It takes up zero phone resources, unlike the Facebook app, which is known for slowing down your entire phone . [1] * The messenger app wants to send me notifications about stupid things and collect personal data using its over-broad permissi…
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#434So much complaining. The web app version is crap, of course they want to move people over to the app. Why waste resources on an inferior web version when they can focus their attention on the very successful mobile app. Its just good business sense and seeing that 99.9999999999% of Facebook users already have Messenger installed, its a non issue.
Easy on the 9s there buddy, that's one in a trillion.
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#435Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use Messenger mostly because it's the only app that's actually achieved quorum amongst people who I talk to. If that weren't true, I wouldn't use Messenger, and if that's not true for you, I can understand not using it. I don't really understand, however, why folks like you try to make this a morality issue.
I never mentioned morality, what do you mean?
> FB's decision just pushed me and all other similar users (users that already are on the fringes of FB usage, using it only rarely) even further away.
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#436Earlier quoted context omitted.
Android Chrome supports push notifications, even when the browser is not loaded.
I keep saying this in every comment I made on this thread, but I'm talking about the entire mobile ecosystem. Who cares if Android Chrome supports it, iOS doesn't. Which means it's not a 100% coverage. Just by letting this happen you are providing a low quality service to not just the iOS users but also the Android users, since there will be an assumption that the recipient doesn't always get the message in realtime.…
1) you can never assume a recipient ever has their phone on, with them and in a non-silent mode 2) users can disable push notifications for individual apps anyway
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#437Earlier quoted context omitted.
well the facebook app is always on, even in background. It is probably reading every keystroke and touch action, and even every pause between actions. But when accessing the basic browser site inside tinfoil, they can only get http actions you actually transmit, such as likes, login times, page loads, etc.
You think apps can read the text you type in to other apps without your permission?
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#438Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm just gonna go ahead and mention [messenger.com]( https://www.messenger.com/ ) for anyone who agrees with you and doesn't know about it. It's essentially the messenger app in the browser, so you can access your Facebook messages without even coming across the news feed, any ads, etc.
All I get is a big ad to install the app from Google Play.
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#439http://techcrunch.com/2016/06/03/facebook-is-disabling-messa...
Re: Facebook disabling messaging in its mobile web app to push people to Messenger
#440Earlier quoted context omitted.
I keep saying this in every comment I made on this thread, but I'm talking about the entire mobile ecosystem. Who cares if Android Chrome supports it, iOS doesn't. Which means it's not a 100% coverage. Just by letting this happen you are providing a low quality service to not just the iOS users but also the Android users, since there will be an assumption that the recipient doesn't always get the message in realtime.…
I call shenanigans for two reasons: 1) you can never assume a recipient ever has their phone on, with them and in a non-silent mode 2) users can disable push notifications for individual apps anyway
That said, the reasons you mention are pretty edge cases. Instead of just hating on it, just stop and think about it for a moment without prejudice. When you email someone you don't expect them to read it immediately, but when you send a text you at least expect them to know they received something, no? (If you say no to this, I really have nothing else to say anymore, you would be just denying the reality) That's what Facebook wants to be. They're competing with SMS, not email.