Live data from Hacker News

Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

people.ischool.berkeley.edu

41–50 of 240 posts

Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

#41

This is pressing two letters, and you're explicitly told to press them in a way which feels random (which is going to be culturally determined). Aristotle would say that this is about habit, not free will -- unless you're opting to ignore the instructions.

Can you elaborate on how one's perception of randomness is subject to cultural bias? You do have to realize that frequent runs of repeated characters are expected to appear in a truly random sequence, but that's more a matter of basic reasoning (or perhaps education) than culture.

"FFFFFFFF" or "DDDDDDD" are random sequences if they're generated by a random process, but we [note: I wonder who 'we' means] expect "random" to mean "frequently changing" or "chaotic-looking".

This might easily be more about formal education in statistics than about culture, though. I'd expect people from any culture we know about to have the intuitive expectations I mentioned -- identifying randomness with chaos.

Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

#43
post #32
post #8

I counted up from 0 in binary (excluding leading zeroes) and even with a completely predictable series, it only did slightly better than 50%. I was expecting more (that on-line game of 20 questions was freaky good).

Which 20 questions game?

I'm guessing this: http://en.akinator.com/

Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

#44
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your premise "open the source code for this, run it in node, get the probability of guessing f or d, and then guess the one that's lower" goes straight against the explicit request to try to type randomly, everything that follows althoug may be correct doesn't apply here.

Choosing to ignore the rules as prescribed is a great demonstration of free will.

Nice, thinking out of the "meta-box" here?

Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

#47
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your premise "open the source code for this, run it in node, get the probability of guessing f or d, and then guess the one that's lower" goes straight against the explicit request to try to type randomly, everything that follows althoug may be correct doesn't apply here.

Choosing to ignore the rules as prescribed is a great demonstration of free will.

Of course, that's precisely what one would predict a user to do.

Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

#48
Can this be used for game AI? I think it could. I wonder if people could apply this to games like Tennis? Or maybe to approaches to the basket in Basketball?

I am using KeePass 1.31's Random Password generator with minus and underline. The oracle is getting 59%. Hmm. Also, when I generate a 64 character string with two possible characters, KeePass claims I have 72 bits of entropy. Hmmm!

Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

#49

I am stuck at around 0.76. I think its flawed - Whatever I press it never changes by more than 1% How can the prediction for 'f' be 0.764 and for 'd' be 0.763 - they don't add up to 1.

It isn't telling you the odds of what you'll do next. It's telling you how often its hidden predictions been right so far. So if you've hit 100 keys, and it secretly guessed 75 of them right, it will display 0.75. The more you play, the more slowly this number moves, because each additional guess has a smaller effect on the overall average.

>The more you play, the more slowly this number moves, because each additional guess has a smaller effect on the overall average.

Not exactly, seems to be a running average with a specific window.

Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle

#50
post #24

At first I was stuck at ~0.95 but I was just striking the keys really fast but then I concentrated and looked at the keys and really tried to feel which key I wanted to press and it worked. I was able to score lower ~0.4. I'm computationally irreducible for now.

Well, if your score is .4, a computer could predict you with .6 accuracy just by predicting what you will press and then guessing the opposite :)
Post reply on HN