Tweet has been deleted: https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/738258436161449984 I deleted the tweet with the picture of the sandbox because people start hyping it up without linking the clarification. And the "clarification" tweet: https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/738084828202053633 For those late to the party: the sandbox bypass exception for Blizzard only affects the access() family of syscalls - probably harmless Edit…
I Google'd and here is one result, showing at least one theoretical security vulnerability of access(): http://stackoverflow.com/a/14333217/3650441 If an attacker knows what files Blizzard is calling access() on, they could likely use this exploit and execute arbitrary code.
Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
11–20 of 69 posts
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#12I recall a story of how the windows 95 team (or the like) was crazy dedicated to backwards compatibility, so they had a check to see if the user was running Roller Coaster Tycoon and if so, disabled virtual memory so the game would run. Though I'd like to know more details, like: * Why does blizzard need to run in the sandbox on Mac OS X? The app sandbox is opt-in (though required for App Store apps) * Can anyone set…
Interesting point. Never heard of any program impersonating 'Warden' for malicious purposes but it seems possible.
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#13I recall a story of how the windows 95 team (or the like) was crazy dedicated to backwards compatibility, so they had a check to see if the user was running Roller Coaster Tycoon and if so, disabled virtual memory so the game would run. Though I'd like to know more details, like: * Why does blizzard need to run in the sandbox on Mac OS X? The app sandbox is opt-in (though required for App Store apps) * Can anyone set…
https://www.wired.com/2016/01/nsa-hacker-chief-explains-how-...
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#14I recall a story of how the windows 95 team (or the like) was crazy dedicated to backwards compatibility, so they had a check to see if the user was running Roller Coaster Tycoon and if so, disabled virtual memory so the game would run. Though I'd like to know more details, like: * Why does blizzard need to run in the sandbox on Mac OS X? The app sandbox is opt-in (though required for App Store apps) * Can anyone set…
Apparently Steam games are favourite attack vector of NSA, they love exploiting Steam games on sysadmin machines. https://www.wired.com/2016/01/nsa-hacker-chief-explains-how-...
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#15Truth is--he knew what was going to happen, so this looks just like another excuse to rant.
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#16This guy published an app that did jailbreak detection and some other stuff on the App Store, it was taken down, and has been rambling since then in a very very childish way about stuff like this: https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/738286205708738560 Truth is--he knew what was going to happen, so this looks just like another excuse to rant.
If I recall correctly, the pangu dev team attended some of his sessions about iOS hacking and used this knowledge to create a publicly available jailbreak tool. He then started to rant about how they "stole" his technologies on twitter (see for example https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/481020166483238912).
More about his childish public behavior related to the jailbreak scene can be read here: http://www.iclarified.com/41983/pangu-jailbreak-stops-using-...
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#17This guy published an app that did jailbreak detection and some other stuff on the App Store, it was taken down, and has been rambling since then in a very very childish way about stuff like this: https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/738286205708738560 Truth is--he knew what was going to happen, so this looks just like another excuse to rant.
He is known in the jailbreak scene as someone who cannot stay serious - he's always involved in some kind of drama. If I recall correctly, the pangu dev team attended some of his sessions about iOS hacking and used this knowledge to create a publicly available jailbreak tool. He then started to rant about how they "stole" his technologies on twitter (see for example https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/481020166483238912…
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#18This guy published an app that did jailbreak detection and some other stuff on the App Store, it was taken down, and has been rambling since then in a very very childish way about stuff like this: https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/738286205708738560 Truth is--he knew what was going to happen, so this looks just like another excuse to rant.
He is known in the jailbreak scene as someone who cannot stay serious - he's always involved in some kind of drama. If I recall correctly, the pangu dev team attended some of his sessions about iOS hacking and used this knowledge to create a publicly available jailbreak tool. He then started to rant about how they "stole" his technologies on twitter (see for example https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/481020166483238912…
After the first release, pangu replaced his bug by one of theirs (and both bugs were fixed by apple in a subsequent iOS release.) He probably had to spend some time finding a new bug to use in his classes so it's understandable to be pissed.
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#19I recall a story of how the windows 95 team (or the like) was crazy dedicated to backwards compatibility, so they had a check to see if the user was running Roller Coaster Tycoon and if so, disabled virtual memory so the game would run. Though I'd like to know more details, like: * Why does blizzard need to run in the sandbox on Mac OS X? The app sandbox is opt-in (though required for App Store apps) * Can anyone set…
Perhaps you meant it's a later version of Windows, or the game's spiritual predecessor, Theme Park, which ran in DOS.
Re: Blizzard Exempt from iOS and MacOS Security Sandbox
#20Tweet has been deleted: https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/738258436161449984 I deleted the tweet with the picture of the sandbox because people start hyping it up without linking the clarification. And the "clarification" tweet: https://twitter.com/i0n1c/status/738084828202053633 For those late to the party: the sandbox bypass exception for Blizzard only affects the access() family of syscalls - probably harmless Edit…
I Google'd and here is one result, showing at least one theoretical security vulnerability of access(): http://stackoverflow.com/a/14333217/3650441 If an attacker knows what files Blizzard is calling access() on, they could likely use this exploit and execute arbitrary code.