Live data from Hacker News

Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

mixergynotes.com

41–50 of 50 posts

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#41

Twitter makes about $25M yearly from search deals, and has a more sustainable business than TwitPic. When can we kill the meme that twitter and facebook are not making money or are not profitable?

When they go public and we can see the balance sheets and not just press releases.

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#42
post #10
post #8

revenue took off when they moved from Adsense to other ad promoters For those of you struggling with adsense, take note.

When is a good time to switch, and where to? Does it make sense for smaller sites, too?

So, my 2 cents: First, sign up with as many ad networks as you can. Then, note the CPMs that you are getting with each ad network. Finally, chain the ad tags together using minimums and redirects. For example, say you've tried 5 ad networks: A, B, C, D, and AdSense. Put ad tags from A on your site, and redirect to B if A goes below a certain minimum. Then redirect to C if B goes below another lower minimum. Keep redirecting until you get to AdSense, the internet's remnant provider.

Every once in a while, check in and make sure that your redirects and minimums are making sense. If you do this, then you'll be capturing a pretty high CPM. To my knowledge, almost all networks support this structure, except for AdSense, which doesn't redirect and therefor goes at the end of the chain.

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#43
post #3

I may be mistaken but no where in this article does it say that Noah Everett makes $5million a year. It does say "revenue projections: $3-4 million" and "#1 – have a company worth 8 figures by 24, #2 – have a company generating 7 figures/year in revenue by 25"

No you're correct, just a typical Mixergy puff-piece line.

Mixergynotes is not associated with Mixergy.

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#44
post #19
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course the other factor: Twitter: funding $160m, you say rev $25m Twitpic: funding $0, rev $5m So I think twitpic comes out pretty fantastically well.

That's daft. Funding isn't a liability (in the financial sense), and those numbers don't say anything about growth prospects.

It'll be interesting to see how Twitter grow their revenue. The number of customers who will pay $m's to do a deal seems reasonably small.

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#45
post #7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's about $25 Million a year.

Of course the other factor: Twitter: funding $160m, you say rev $25m Twitpic: funding $0, rev $5m So I think twitpic comes out pretty fantastically well.

That is one way to look at it but the headline says. 'Twitter makes nothing.' So the comment is about setting the record straight, not comparing business models.

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in Charleston and have met Noah a few times (nice guy, incidentally). If you come visit, you will see why someone would want to live here pretty quickly.

I meant no disrespect to SC. I've actually heard Charleston is a nice example of "New Urbanist" housing development and the southern charm and warm weather is hard to beat. I just thought it was really funny that he cited the Patriot movie as a reason to move there. I like a lot of silly movies, but never thought to relocate because of them!

I think you are looking too much into this.

It's likely he was intrigued by the place because of the movie, checked it out, liked it and decided to move.

I'm sure he didn't head for the airport when the credits rolled.

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#47

Twitter makes about $25M yearly from search deals, and has a more sustainable business than TwitPic. When can we kill the meme that twitter and facebook are not making money or are not profitable?

When they go public and we can see the balance sheets and not just press releases.

In the context of an interview with a tiny private company built on a clearly much bigger private company, I don't think your comment makes much sense.

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When they go public and we can see the balance sheets and not just press releases.

In the context of an interview with a tiny private company built on a clearly much bigger private company, I don't think your comment makes much sense.

It was a direct answer to your question which was explicitly about fb + twitter. What's not to get?

Re: Notes on Mixergy interview with TwitPic founder Noah Everett

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the context of an interview with a tiny private company built on a clearly much bigger private company, I don't think your comment makes much sense.

It was a direct answer to your question which was explicitly about fb + twitter. What's not to get?

It was not at all a direct answer to the title of the original post, which implied twitter makes no money. It also doesn't make much sense, considering there are an inordinate number of profitable private companies.
Post reply on HN