Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

bbc.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

71–80 of 82 posts

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#71

Post by benjohnson »

visakanv wrote: post #65
benjohnson wrote: post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's make the question as hard as possible: The child dies a lingering, painful death and the child despairs. The annoying bit is that the Christian answer to this question sucks from a rational viewpoint - we humans cry out for our own justice against this God that allows such suffering. Just be mindful before you assume that Christians are completely crazy, that for from our viewpoint God suffers as well - not onl…

So does that... God is some sort of... sadomasochist? (I'm sorry if that sounds insensitive, I'm really just trying to understand.)

Good question!

It really seems that from our viewpoint is would seem so!

The Christian viewpoint is that suffering will be redeemed - God promises us that he will "wipe away every tear from their eyes" (Revelation of St. John 21:4)

As Christians, one of the problems that we create is that we try to make all "make sense." We can't - because we don't have the full picture. As such, I have to apologize that my answer for the problem of evil isn't satisfactory.

Here's a good overview from a theological and rational viewpoint:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_of_all_possible_worlds

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#72

Post by benjohnson »

lomnakkus wrote: post #66
benjohnson wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a Christian, I would agree - God's revelation stands in opposition to human rationality. Examples: He demands that we love our enemies. Give away our possessions. Have faith where there is absolutely no hope in anything after our minds disintegrate after death. The Bible addresses this: "We are fools for Christ [...] We are weak, but you are strong! You are honored, we are dishonored!" 1 Corinthians 4:10

> As a Christian, I would agree - God's revelation stands in opposition to human rationality. But then... how do you know anything if you can just "faith it!" instead? I mean, if I could choose to just believe things "because" then that's obviously a lot easier (cognitively) than reasoning my way through it[1], but it's not very satisfactory, philosophically. [1] Obviously that process could still lead to a lot of wr…

I agree! Fundamentally you can't know God's revelation to us. To be a Christian is to be filled with tremendous doubt and to always engaged in a deep struggle with faith.

The flip side is that our rational thoughts always lead to the conclusion that we have meaningless existence: Either we die, or our universe collapses, or we change into something new. Sincere shows us we march to a death so complete that we don't even know we're dead.

The alternative Christian viewpoint - the crazy bible story about whales, arks, weird laws and a jewish man who claims to be God and yet dies - starts to sound like hope to some people.

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#73

Post by gnaritas »

benjohnson wrote: post #72
lomnakkus wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As a Christian, I would agree - God's revelation stands in opposition to human rationality. But then... how do you know anything if you can just "faith it!" instead? I mean, if I could choose to just believe things "because" then that's obviously a lot easier (cognitively) than reasoning my way through it[1], but it's not very satisfactory, philosophically. [1] Obviously that process could still lead to a lot of wr…

I agree! Fundamentally you can't know God's revelation to us. To be a Christian is to be filled with tremendous doubt and to always engaged in a deep struggle with faith. The flip side is that our rational thoughts always lead to the conclusion that we have meaningless existence: Either we die, or our universe collapses, or we change into something new. Sincere shows us we march to a death so complete that we don't e…

> To be a Christian is to be filled with tremendous doubt and to always engaged in a deep struggle with faith.

I can simplify that further, to be Christian is to deny reason.

The struggle with faith is a struggle against reason, faith stands in opposition to reason and rightly should lose. That faith wins over reason is a testament to the failure of critical thinking on that topic. Belief should never triumph over reason otherwise one can believe anything and wind up forever lost in the infinity of delusions of the mind. Reason is how you separate fantasy from reality, which is a rather important skill to have.

> The flip side is that our rational thoughts always lead to the conclusion that we have meaningless existence

Yours might, but I'd assert those thoughts aren't rational nor is your definition of meaningless. Atheists have no problem at all finding meaning in their lives; to say a life without God is meaningless is quite frankly a completely nonsensical statement that can only make sense in the mind of a person unable to see beyond his own presupposition of God and small minded view of the world. You seem to forget you live in a world full of people who don't believe in your God whom you are basically asserting have meaningless lives because they don't share your particular superstition; it's really quite silly to believe that.

> The alternative Christian viewpoint - the crazy bible story about whales, arks, weird laws and a jewish man who claims to be God and yet dies - starts to sound like hope to some people.

It sounds insane to rational people, because it is. That anyone can actually believe that stuff is a sign of a complete lack of critical thinking skills on that subject.

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#74

Post by dang »

Aelinsaar wrote: post #70
MustardTiger wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, because of "Heimlich overpowered science all along the way with his slick tactics and intimidation, and everyone, including us at the AHA, caved in." Seriously, read what you reply to.

Not your silly little crackpot site, the Mayo clinic site. Now take your meds.

Your comments have repeatedly been violating the HN guidelines by being uncivil and unsubstantive. We ban accounts that do this, so please stop doing this. Instead, please (re)-read the site rules and post civilly and substantively, or not at all.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#75

Post by benjohnson »

gnaritas wrote: post #73
benjohnson wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree! Fundamentally you can't know God's revelation to us. To be a Christian is to be filled with tremendous doubt and to always engaged in a deep struggle with faith. The flip side is that our rational thoughts always lead to the conclusion that we have meaningless existence: Either we die, or our universe collapses, or we change into something new. Sincere shows us we march to a death so complete that we don't e…

> To be a Christian is to be filled with tremendous doubt and to always engaged in a deep struggle with faith. I can simplify that further, to be Christian is to deny reason. The struggle with faith is a struggle against reason, faith stands in opposition to reason and rightly should lose. That faith wins over reason is a testament to the failure of critical thinking on that topic. Belief should never triumph over re…

I wasn't being clear:

As I understand it, from all known rational viewpoints everything about our lives are entirely meaningless because the evidence shows that nothing about our lives will remain or will be observed.

Everything about you will not exist in a few short years.

Everything ever built by anyone will either not exist or will be no longer have any energy (and no observer) once the universe collapses or goes through heat-death.

To be a Christian is to accept reason - and then to have hope.

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#76

Post by gnaritas »

benjohnson wrote: post #75
gnaritas wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> To be a Christian is to be filled with tremendous doubt and to always engaged in a deep struggle with faith. I can simplify that further, to be Christian is to deny reason. The struggle with faith is a struggle against reason, faith stands in opposition to reason and rightly should lose. That faith wins over reason is a testament to the failure of critical thinking on that topic. Belief should never triumph over re…

I wasn't being clear: As I understand it, from all known rational viewpoints everything about our lives are entirely meaningless because the evidence shows that nothing about our lives will remain or will be observed. Everything about you will not exist in a few short years. Everything ever built by anyone will either not exist or will be no longer have any energy (and no observer) once the universe collapses or goes…

> As I understand it, from all known rational viewpoints everything about our lives are entirely meaningless because the evidence shows that nothing about our lives will remain or will be observed.

I honestly don't think you do understand it if you think all known rational viewpoints see life as meaningless because that's simply not true. The lack of immortality does not make life meaningless; that's a belief your religion sold you.

"meaningless", you keep you that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

> Everything about you will not exist in a few short years.

So what? The same applies to everyone. Doesn't make life meaningless.

> Everything ever built by anyone will either not exist or will be no longer have any energy (and no observer) once the universe collapses or goes through heat-death.

Again, so what? Doesn't make life meaningless. I do not care what happens to the universe billions of years in the future and if you do, then that's something you could stand to reexamine because thinking that it makes life meaningless is not rational.

> To be a Christian is to accept reason - and then to have hope.

Hope, sure, but reason, I do not think so. You are basically asserting that lack of a God equals a meaningless existence, a completely foundation-less assertion entirely devoid of reason that can't be logically argued, only asserted as a circular argument that pre-supposes God's existence.

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#77

Post by MustardTiger »

Aelinsaar wrote: post #70
MustardTiger wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, because of "Heimlich overpowered science all along the way with his slick tactics and intimidation, and everyone, including us at the AHA, caved in." Seriously, read what you reply to.

Not your silly little crackpot site, the Mayo clinic site. Now take your meds.

Wikipedia is neither mine, nor "silly little crackpot".

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#78

Post by Aelinsaar »

dang wrote: post #74
Aelinsaar wrote: post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not your silly little crackpot site, the Mayo clinic site. Now take your meds.

Your comments have repeatedly been violating the HN guidelines by being uncivil and unsubstantive. We ban accounts that do this, so please stop doing this. Instead, please (re)-read the site rules and post civilly and substantively, or not at all. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

It would be nice if you could offer this service to all of your posters, equally.

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#79

Post by dang »

Aelinsaar wrote: post #78
dang wrote: post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your comments have repeatedly been violating the HN guidelines by being uncivil and unsubstantive. We ban accounts that do this, so please stop doing this. Instead, please (re)-read the site rules and post civilly and substantively, or not at all. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

It would be nice if you could offer this service to all of your posters, equally.

That would require reading every post, which is impossible.

Re: Dr Heimlich saves choking woman with manoeuvre he invented

#80

Post by Aelinsaar »

dang wrote: post #79
Aelinsaar wrote: post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be nice if you could offer this service to all of your posters, equally.

That would require reading every post, which is impossible.

Understandable, then I guess you could just do it for this quote chain? Do you really want a crackpot pimping his personal site and cause? You'll just be putting out more fires with other people later, and you still won't really know why they're cropping up.
Post reply on HN