In my head, I say "curl" as in curly hair. It's really "see-url"!? I think it's too late for my brain to correct that.
A new Curl logo
21–30 of 119 posts
Re: A new Curl logo
#22Re: A new Curl logo
#23Re: A new Curl logo
#24According to RFC3986, URIs (the proper name; URLs are a kind of URI) are correctly of the form:
:
For some schemes, the may contain a , the format for which is: //[/] |
So it's only hierarchical URIs with a defined authority that have the (admittedly iconic) "://" in them.I know most people identity URIs as having that sequence in them, but these are all valid URIs:
mailto:bob@example.com
sip:bob@example.com
tel:+18005550123
file:/path/to/file
I'm not saying I expect everyone to understand these subtleties, but people who claim to grok URLs ought to.Re: A new Curl logo
#25I just realized after all these years, I think I've been saying the name wrong. In my head, I say "curl" as in curly hair. It's really "see-url"!? I think it's too late for my brain to correct that.
Re: A new Curl logo
#26For something that claims to "grok" URLs, using "://" as part of the logo seems to be misunderstanding how URLs (are supposed to) work. According to RFC3986, URIs (the proper name; URLs are a kind of URI) are correctly of the form: : For some schemes, the may contain a , the format for which is: // [/ ] | So it's only hierarchical URIs with a defined authority that have the (admittedly iconic) "://" in them. I know m…
Re: A new Curl logo
#27I can't help but see the 'l' floating up higher than the rest of the letters (it isn't). Even so, it's a lot better than the original.
Re: A new Curl logo
#28I just realized after all these years, I think I've been saying the name wrong. In my head, I say "curl" as in curly hair. It's really "see-url"!? I think it's too late for my brain to correct that.
"We pronounce curl and cURL with an initial k sound: [kurl]."
They do, however, note that the "fact it can also be pronounced 'see URL' also helped" [to choose the name].
Re: A new Curl logo
#29For something that claims to "grok" URLs, using "://" as part of the logo seems to be misunderstanding how URLs (are supposed to) work. According to RFC3986, URIs (the proper name; URLs are a kind of URI) are correctly of the form: : For some schemes, the may contain a , the format for which is: // [/ ] | So it's only hierarchical URIs with a defined authority that have the (admittedly iconic) "://" in them. I know m…
It's a logo dude...