I was not happy with features and UX of other productivity trackers. Most of the time tracking software is made for controlling employees or for billing clients and I just wanted an automated productivity measurement. I tried RescueTime before but it was too expensive for its functionality ($72-108/year) and also collected all my tracked data on their servers. There is standalone ManicTime on Windows but OS X standal…
this is super awesome. I've been using rescuetime for around two years, and although it's worked great I'd love to see more feature progress. Also there's no 2FA support which is quite scary for something with such sensitive data. I love your dock icon as well. I was trying to build a custom version of that but for my tmux line, but rescuetime's API doesn't provide realtime info. Will you open up some APIs for the da…
Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
131–140 of 239 posts
Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#132I have used Rescuetime for years and for the most part, am very satisfied with the service. It would be helpful if you added a simple comparison between Rescuetime and your service.
Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#133I have used Rescuetime for years and for the most part, am very satisfied with the service. It would be helpful if you added a simple comparison between Rescuetime and your service.
Downsides compared to RT: no sync between devices (and it's not coming soon), no "offline time" (but it's temporary).
Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, no, it will require complete re-write and the app also heavily relies on OS X accessibility. But I remember using ManicTime on Windows, give it a try maybe.
ManicTime looks slick, feature filled and usable, but the visualization it chose is confusing. I look at all those little lines and it reminds me of the windows XP defragger.
YMMW but IMO it is a shining example of modern Windows UX done right. A couple of examples
* double clicking selects the block you clicked on until next previously tagged time
* the tagging dialog has wonderful autocomplete
* you can set up automatic tagging
* you can add timelines from outlook etc
Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#135Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#136I was not happy with features and UX of other productivity trackers. Most of the time tracking software is made for controlling employees or for billing clients and I just wanted an automated productivity measurement. I tried RescueTime before but it was too expensive for its functionality ($72-108/year) and also collected all my tracked data on their servers. There is standalone ManicTime on Windows but OS X standal…
> $ brew cask info qbserve > Error: No available Cask for qbserve Would be nice if you'd do a PR to get your app into Homebrew. It's just much easier to find, install and update apps with Cask.
Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#137Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#138I have used Rescuetime for years and for the most part, am very satisfied with the service. It would be helpful if you added a simple comparison between Rescuetime and your service.
Currently the differences are window tracking (RT only tracks apps afaik), chat tracking, instant feedback, and keeping the tracked data on your machine. Downsides compared to RT: no sync between devices (and it's not coming soon), no "offline time" (but it's temporary).
Rescuetime does allow window tracking (unless I don't understand what that means).
For me personally, the most essential Rescuetime features missing in your app are:
- ability to install a client on gnu, OS X and Windows.
- 95% of the time, it correctly categorizes my activities, requiring very little input from me.
Looking forward to trying your app!
Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
You've hit several good points here! This looks really cool. I've never used something like this, but I'm seriously considering buying it. I love the single price up front and the privacy of not sending my tracking data to some unknown server on the internet. My only complaint is that I absolutely hate the name. I don't even know how to pronounce it. "Cube-serv?" "Queue Observe?" Don't make me think. Also, I'd be emb…
Haha, yes, we had some doubts about the name's UX but nothing better was found. It's cube-serve in my opinion, an observing cube. Well, I'm not a native English speaker... :)
Re: Show HN: Automatic private time tracking for OS X
#140I guess the time tracking works right now by just tallying up seconds for each category? And it isn't recording time stamps? Recording time stamps might end up taking up too much space?