Earlier quoted context omitted.
Non-Chinese students also have those same problems, but they don't cheat like the Chinese. Chinese students cheat because cheating is part of Chinese culture. Go to China and you'll be shocked at how little people care about others in public, or society at large. This is a place where bystanders will watch cars swerve wildly around an open manhole cover over and over, nearly getting in accidents, doing nothing to hel…
I went to a privileged American school where cheating was not uncommon. I watched at least two students openly cheat their way into Ivy League colleges, whose rich parents ensured they were unscathed when they were caught. I watched students with inferior intellect, but superior connections, finesse their way into colleges beyond their pay grade. I sure as heck hope foreigners don't judge me based on their encounters…
> So let's try to avoid taking the most extreme headlines ever written about modern China and painting all Chinese with a single stroke. The 1900s are over.
The article and headline seem balanced to me.
I find this accusation of racism common in response to articles critical of Chinese. Perhaps you misunderstand the text.
The implied word in the headline is some, not all,
"How an industry helps [some] Chinese students cheat their way into and through U.S. colleges"
Does that make it more clear? If not, then how, in your view, could this headline be rewritten to not be racist?