Live data from Hacker News

Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

techcrunch.com

141–150 of 414 posts

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#141
post #95
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because they probably aren't charities, and can't afford to donat e Free resources for your perpetual enjoyment?

Then we're back to my initial point: they never should have started as one.

You're wrong. It would be awful to live somewhere where you get to choose which companies are allowed to start.

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#142
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is absolutely false. Plenty of large companies are able to negotiate their rates on AWS. You just have to be huge.

Do you realize that the person you're responding to used to run Reddit's servers?

Is that why the comment was deleted?

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are some better alternatives to s3?

Colocation hosting your own servers around the world... you know, the original way.

s3 is awesome. Keep using it but put your own boxes in a colo with a direct connect to aws (not all colos offer this unfortunately). Your boxes can then g3 20+tb of ssd cache in front of your raw pb+ datasets in s3.

https://aws.amazon.com/directconnect/pricing/

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even cheaper and easier is just to rent dedicated servers or VPSes.

For image-heavy use I found its just cheaper to build your own box and cohost instead of renting.

How do you figure that? You can rent the exact same server as a dedicated server. The difference is, you have no capital outlay up front, you don't need to ship and rack it or replace broken parts and there is only a month-to-month commitment.

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Colocation hosting your own servers around the world... you know, the original way.

Is that really cheaper than S3, though?

Massively cheaper at scale. Do the basic math.

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you realize that the person you're responding to used to run Reddit's servers?

Is that why the comment was deleted?

I didn't say he was right. And I also have no idea why his comment was deleted.

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back to reality: would imgur have become so popular if it wasn't free? Who would pay? Reddit users? I don't think so.

You seem to be asserting that anything is okay as long as it makes money. Nobody has to make a website. If the only way you can think of to make money is bait-and-switch, then you can choose to do that, or you can choose to go back to the drawing board and come up with a less unpleasant business plan. If you choose the former, don't expect me to cheer because you found a way to make money, and you think that's the on…

I agree with you. When imgur started there was a definite need. Now it's being replaced because there's a new need (caused by imgur changing the way it operates).

Also, I don't think you're going to make everyone happy as a business, and that's (probably) okay.

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#148
post #70
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, you get a link that looks like a direct link (eg https://i.imgur.com/whatever.png ) but it's not (always) a direct link. This is what people are complaining about. Sending that link to people sometimes results in them getting redirected to the ad-laden imgur page.

The "direct links" only ever redirect to the non-direct version on mobile for me. Doesn't happen on desktop though.

I've seen the direct links get redirected to the non-direct page on desktop.

It appears to still happen if, e.g., the link is on Twitter - random example https://twitter.com/SilentRENE/status/735732252877819904 (seems to be inconsistent - first time I was redirected, but now it goes directly to the image. Opening the Twitter page in another browser also resulted in a redirect)

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#149

Having a third party host Reddit's images gave away a bunch of control to the point that imgur has its own community based upon the site . At the time Reddit didn't have the resources to make a competitor but this seems to be a good move now that imgur is doing dark patterns.

On the other hand it let reddit offload most of their bandwidth to Imgur, and I don't think they lost much ad revenue over it.

Re: Reddit launches image uploads, ditching alliance with Imgur

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Colocation hosting your own servers around the world... you know, the original way.

Is that really cheaper than S3, though?

Even at Amazon's cheapest posted bandwidth tier you're paying $50+ per terabyte for bandwidth.

Any dedicated hosting company (OVH, Hetzner, etc...) will cost less than 3% of that (and that's on the high end).

Bandwidth is cheap, but AWS marks it up roughly 30x-50x what you'd pay in a dedicated environment.

Post reply on HN