Live data from Hacker News

Realm 1.0

realm.io

91–100 of 112 posts

Re: Realm 1.0

#91

The "What is Realm?" paragraph begins with "Realm is not an ORM". Jesus Christ, that was the very first line.

Your comments in this thread break the HN guidelines by being uncivil. We ban accounts that do this, so please (re-)read the site guidelines and only post civilly and substantively from now on: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11769795 and marked it off-topic.

Re: Realm 1.0

#92
Been using Realm in all of my Android projects for the last 8+ months. It has now become my defacto mobile database for all my mobile projects. It's that easy to use. Gets out of the way and lets me focus on business problems, not bit shifting problems.

Re: Realm 1.0

#93
Well I read the front page of the website which says that Realm is a replacement for sqlite and coredata.

I didn't gain any understanding though of why they needed to be replaced and how Realm is different.

Re: Realm 1.0

#94

Realm has excellent marketing, but being a closed source third party SDK disqualifies it as anything I would recommend for my company to use. I've had to deal with enough pain from closed source libraries from the likes of Google and others. Closed-source prevents me from adopting a new platform until the vendor gets around to porting it, and only if it fits with their strategy. Also a middleware-only company is liab…

[deleted]

Re: Realm 1.0

#95

Realm has excellent marketing, but being a closed source third party SDK disqualifies it as anything I would recommend for my company to use. I've had to deal with enough pain from closed source libraries from the likes of Google and others. Closed-source prevents me from adopting a new platform until the vendor gets around to porting it, and only if it fits with their strategy. Also a middleware-only company is liab…

What part of it is closed source?

https://github.com/realm/realm-cocoa https://github.com/realm/realm-java https://github.com/realm/realm-js https://github.com/realm/realm-dotnet

Edit: Apparently not the guts of it, my bad :(

Re: Realm 1.0

#96
post #95

Realm has excellent marketing, but being a closed source third party SDK disqualifies it as anything I would recommend for my company to use. I've had to deal with enough pain from closed source libraries from the likes of Google and others. Closed-source prevents me from adopting a new platform until the vendor gets around to porting it, and only if it fits with their strategy. Also a middleware-only company is liab…

What part of it is closed source? https://github.com/realm/realm-cocoa https://github.com/realm/realm-java https://github.com/realm/realm-js https://github.com/realm/realm-dotnet Edit: Apparently not the guts of it, my bad :(

The core C++ part. They plan to open source it later, but who knows what will happen in the meantime.

Re: Realm 1.0

#97
post #96
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What part of it is closed source? https://github.com/realm/realm-cocoa https://github.com/realm/realm-java https://github.com/realm/realm-js https://github.com/realm/realm-dotnet Edit: Apparently not the guts of it, my bad :(

The core C++ part. They plan to open source it later, but who knows what will happen in the meantime.

Where did you read that they plan to open-source it later?

Re: Realm 1.0

#98

Realm has excellent marketing, but being a closed source third party SDK disqualifies it as anything I would recommend for my company to use. I've had to deal with enough pain from closed source libraries from the likes of Google and others. Closed-source prevents me from adopting a new platform until the vendor gets around to porting it, and only if it fits with their strategy. Also a middleware-only company is liab…

To add on to this, it's also a pure tech services play, which IMO is generally a bit harder to monetize than a product company, but generally a lot easier to sell in an acquisition. Which doesn't make this sitatuion any better.

Re: Realm 1.0

#99
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The core C++ part. They plan to open source it later, but who knows what will happen in the meantime.

Where did you read that they plan to open-source it later?

FAQ time:

I see references to a “core” in the code, what is that? The core is referring to our internal C++ storage engine. It is not currently open-source but we do plan on open-sourcing it also under the Apache 2.0 license once we’ve had a chance to clean it up, rename it, and finalize major features inside of it. In the meantime, its binary releases are made available under the Realm Core (TightDB) Binary License.

https://realm.io/docs/objc/latest/#faq

Re: Realm 1.0

#100
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where did you read that they plan to open-source it later?

FAQ time: I see references to a “core” in the code, what is that? The core is referring to our internal C++ storage engine. It is not currently open-source but we do plan on open-sourcing it also under the Apache 2.0 license once we’ve had a chance to clean it up, rename it, and finalize major features inside of it. In the meantime, its binary releases are made available under the Realm Core (TightDB) Binary License.…

Ah, OK. I always assumed that the core was closed-source for business reasons.
Post reply on HN