Earlier quoted context omitted.
What were the "very dishonest" statements?
Saying that there was no bias in their news selection, when it should be readily apparent that having humans select thing would introduce bias. Not quite outright lying, as you might possibly think they're naive enough to think humans are unbiased, but I don't think they get the benefit of the doubt here. IIRC they also started off saying it was all algorithmic.
Their investigation found "no evidence of systematic political bias." So, not sure where the very dishonest statement is here.