Earlier quoted context omitted.
A new discussion of the ethics of software engineering might be valuable. Other professions have codes of ethics; maybe it's time for software, too.
cf. ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct: https://www.acm.org/about-acm/acm-code-of-ethics-and-profess...
Pastejacking
231–240 of 246 posts
Re: Pastejacking
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm sure that those involved have very interesting rationalizations, but I don't think that it should be viewed from an ethics perspective. Expecting people to behave against their own self interest in the short term, for the good of strangers in the long term, will always end in disappointment. This is actually a pretty simple case of poorly stated objectives being cleverly met by people who are completely self inte…
> I know this sounds kind of "well what did you expect wearing something like that" Which is a perfectly rational question/argument. > Expecting people to behave against their own self interest in the short term, for the good of strangers in the long term, will always end in disappointment. I agree. This is a systemic problem, and appeals to ethics won't work (and the advertisers won't change their metrics because of…
uh. That isn't what I was doing - one party's act in self interest can benefit third parties (even if accidentally)... like electing to not set yourself on fire in a crowded Museum of Yarn and Flammables.
> ...attack the economic incentives underlying their current strategies.
That has been going on since the first ad click payment. I'm guessing that the ideal solution is one that would require a scale of economy that is outside the capabilities of the majority of the market participants, and that is why we still have catch the monkey ads.
Re: Pastejacking
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
See the glorification of the advertising industry in a popular TV show "Mad Men"
Which is a show about how cool it is to be an asshole and ruin your own and other people's lives by making extremely selfish decisions. This is also why I won't watch House of Cards.
Not sure about Mad Men, but HoC doesn't "glorify" its subject. And tons of great art is about "assholes".
The thing is, and this is a very christian message, assholes are people too.
Re: Pastejacking
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Who gives a shit? I do. That's probably why I won't be running an effective business any time soon. Being nice and not fucking people over doesn't get you far in highly competitive markets. I strongly second what 'nitrogen wrote[0]. This is very much about ethics. > Is it ethical for a shop to advertise its products in the shop windows when the people running the shop know that there are higher quality products ava…
That argument would lead you to the conclusion that if your peers are objectively better than you, then it's immoral for you to seek employment; you must improve yourself or choose a different industry. So do you think you are among the world's best in your area of expertise, or are you voluntarily unemployed? ;)
Re: Pastejacking
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is a show about how cool it is to be an asshole and ruin your own and other people's lives by making extremely selfish decisions. This is also why I won't watch House of Cards.
So, do you only watch shows about Gandhi, MLK and J. Christ? Not sure about Mad Men, but HoC doesn't "glorify" its subject. And tons of great art is about "assholes". The thing is, and this is a very christian message, assholes are people too.
Re: Pastejacking
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like a pretty unethical way to make money.
Sure, if you've got a concept of morality based on primarily being motivated to help others rather than pursuing self interest. If that's the case though then the vast majority of people would fall under the category and make it a pretty meaningless description.
Re: Pastejacking
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
FTFY: To solve this, browsers should probably disallow modifying the clipboard .
That would probably break a lot of WYSIWYG-like editors.
Re: Pastejacking
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
That argument would lead you to the conclusion that if your peers are objectively better than you, then it's immoral for you to seek employment; you must improve yourself or choose a different industry. So do you think you are among the world's best in your area of expertise, or are you voluntarily unemployed? ;)
Fortunately, hypocrisy is not a fallacy.
Re: Pastejacking
#239Re: Pastejacking
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, do you only watch shows about Gandhi, MLK and J. Christ? Not sure about Mad Men, but HoC doesn't "glorify" its subject. And tons of great art is about "assholes". The thing is, and this is a very christian message, assholes are people too.
Not sure why you're jumping on this train at this junction...