Obviously, it's just a joke.
Universal.css
61–70 of 118 posts
Re: Universal.css
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want a website that works on enterprise desktops, you aren't using flexbox - you're using floats.
Is that still true? I recently joined a company whose primary audience is education, and our numbers say that less than 1% of our customers use browsers that don't support flexbox. Are public middle schools farther along the tech curve than "enterprise"? (Legitimately curious. It'd be pretty funny if so.)
For what it’s worth my project is about 2.5% no flexbox, which is too high to move over really.
Re: Universal.css
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want a website that works on enterprise desktops, you aren't using flexbox - you're using floats.
Is that still true? I recently joined a company whose primary audience is education, and our numbers say that less than 1% of our customers use browsers that don't support flexbox. Are public middle schools farther along the tech curve than "enterprise"? (Legitimately curious. It'd be pretty funny if so.)
The sticking point for enterprise-y things remains IE, since it only supports flexbox (buggily) as of IE11.
Though there's polyfills like flexibility out there, of course.
Re: Universal.css
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want a website that works on enterprise desktops, you aren't using flexbox - you're using floats.
Is that still true? I recently joined a company whose primary audience is education, and our numbers say that less than 1% of our customers use browsers that don't support flexbox. Are public middle schools farther along the tech curve than "enterprise"? (Legitimately curious. It'd be pretty funny if so.)
Yes, schools use chromebooks
Re: Universal.css
#65At under 5MB, it's quite lightweight compared to other modern tools too, nice!
I saw what you did here
Re: Universal.css
#66> Bootstrap V4 recently introduced spacing utility classes like m-t-1 (which translates to margin-top: 1rem!important), and we thought we'd expand this idea to more classes. Which is worse; when it's done as satire, or seriously?
When you do it as satire but everyone use your work seriously?
That's the best way to say "All of the above" in this case.
Re: Universal.css
#67go on and just waste more time on this by reading the comments
Re: Universal.css
#68Re: Universal.css
#69Poes law meets css: "Poe's law is an Internet adage which states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extreme views will be mistaken by some readers or viewers for sincere expressions of the parodied views.[1][2][3]
"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
Re: Universal.css
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is that still true? I recently joined a company whose primary audience is education, and our numbers say that less than 1% of our customers use browsers that don't support flexbox. Are public middle schools farther along the tech curve than "enterprise"? (Legitimately curious. It'd be pretty funny if so.)
The sticking point for enterprise-y things remains IE, since it only supports flexbox (buggily) as of IE11. Though there's polyfills like flexibility out there, of course.
According to this[0], IE10.