Live data from Hacker News

Google Home

home.google.com

101–110 of 468 posts

Re: Google Home

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, except I trust Google FAR less than I trust Amazon--simply because Google has permeated in many more facets of my digital life (gdocs, gmail, chrome, maps, search, etc). Amazon just has my shopping history.

Actually I would believe that your purchase history is far more lucrative to a company than anything else you listed.

Google also has it in receipt form (assuming Gmail)

Re: Google Home

#102
post #19

When I was younger, I dreamed of something like this. Voice control for my home! A Star Trek computer that I can interact with conversationally! I just say what I want and it happens! Now, I just see an internet-connected microphone in a software black box which I can only interpret as a giant frickin' security liability. I want this, but unless it's open source top-to-bottom, I won't ever actually put one in my home…

This entire keynote just keeps highlighting that one sentence from the end of Maciej's wonderful http://idlewords.com/talks/internet_with_a_human_face.htm "Yesterday ... I realized how long it had been since I looked at a new technology with wonder, instead of an automatic feeling of dread." EDIT: Speaking of Maciej, if you're not already following him on Twitter, today is the day to do that. He's having a field day…

Link?

Re: Google Home

#103
post #19

When I was younger, I dreamed of something like this. Voice control for my home! A Star Trek computer that I can interact with conversationally! I just say what I want and it happens! Now, I just see an internet-connected microphone in a software black box which I can only interpret as a giant frickin' security liability. I want this, but unless it's open source top-to-bottom, I won't ever actually put one in my home…

Those of us with Google smartwatches have had this functionality for some time. Its very convenient to just whispers, "OK Google remind me at 3pm tomorrow about the dog's vet appointment." Or "What's the weather in Reykjavik?" Having this functionality on your phone, tablet, or computer is very different than having it right in front of you at all times. Its hard to quantify, but there's an inconvenience of pulling out a phone or a tablet and even then muscle memory dictates that you'll probably just start typing and swiping instead of speaking.

Having this all tie in with various smarthome appliances will be interesting as well. Sure, I can open my garage door by using an app on my phone but I'd rather just say, "Open the garage door." I think ultimately we prefer to do things like we're dealing with other people, not machines. Amazon's Alexa was a good first step towards this. I'm glad Google is chasing Amazon as Google has become a Microsoftian organization that only does well when they're chasing a competitor or having one right on their heels.

Re: Google Home

#106
post #19

When I was younger, I dreamed of something like this. Voice control for my home! A Star Trek computer that I can interact with conversationally! I just say what I want and it happens! Now, I just see an internet-connected microphone in a software black box which I can only interpret as a giant frickin' security liability. I want this, but unless it's open source top-to-bottom, I won't ever actually put one in my home…

This entire keynote just keeps highlighting that one sentence from the end of Maciej's wonderful http://idlewords.com/talks/internet_with_a_human_face.htm "Yesterday ... I realized how long it had been since I looked at a new technology with wonder, instead of an automatic feeling of dread." EDIT: Speaking of Maciej, if you're not already following him on Twitter, today is the day to do that. He's having a field day…

> EDIT: Speaking of Maciej, if you're not already following him on Twitter, today is the day to do that. He's having a field day with this keynote.

Is he? Last tweet I can find of his is from yesterday. Could you provide the link you're using?

Re: Google Home

#107
Competition in this space is welcome! Can't wait to see what their difference / what sets them apart from Echo. Given Google's propensity to sell Ads, it will be interesting to see if customers are willing to put a device like this in their house.

Reminded me of a humidifier for some reason - http://www.amazon.com/Aromatherapy-Essential-Oil-Diffuser-co...

Re: Google Home

#108
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lets stop this nonsense. They don't sell access to your personal information. There is nowhere that I can buy your personal information from google. What they sell is access to your attention. When advertising, I'm looking for people that match these characteristics, and what I'm purchasing is the possibility to show you an ad if you match certain criteria.

They sell the ability to use your data, not to access/see/download it. I can use all the data for ad targeting, but in no way I can actually see it. Advertisers buy the attention, Publishers sell it. Google is the intermediary that connects the right advertiser to the right publishers, and charges x%.

Yes! I find it so hypocritical of people who seems to be extra careful about their personal information. I understand this makes sense for some people, but for most of the others, Google using your meta-data to show things which might interest you and by also helping you with great applications is cool. Not everyone wants to pay for things to get privacy.

Re: Google Home

#109
post #60
post #42

RFP - Request For Project 1. Train Google Home to recognize Amazon Echo's voice as its owner. 2. Train Amazon Echo to recognize Siri's voice as its owner 3. Train Siri to recognize Google Home's voice as its owner 4. Kick start some kind of endless loop between the three of them.

What about Watson?

Can you buy a Watson and put it on your shelf?

Re: Google Home

#110
post #59
post #42

RFP - Request For Project 1. Train Google Home to recognize Amazon Echo's voice as its owner. 2. Train Amazon Echo to recognize Siri's voice as its owner 3. Train Siri to recognize Google Home's voice as its owner 4. Kick start some kind of endless loop between the three of them.

Amazon's Echo doesn't have an owner concept. I didn't think Siri did either. My Echo can take commands from anyone, there's no authentication at all outside of initial set up with your Amazon account. My daughter and I have completely different voices and we use it without problems.

Siri learns your voice if you activate the "Hey Siri" option. AFAIK it doesn't affect normal [manual] commands.
Post reply on HN