Live data from Hacker News

In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

boredpanda.com

51–60 of 99 posts

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#51

I'd like to see more audio augmented reality systems. Translation, taking baby cry down a notch, amplifying speech directed at you, autofiguring out best moment to tell you things you might need to know.

I've always thought it'd be great to have a mask/muzzle that turns a babies cry into laughing or something else more pleasant while seated next to them on the plane.

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#52
post #49
post #40

I have a bad enough time getting Siri to understand my Aussie accent. Throw in something as inaccurate as Google Translate and you'll have... A pile of garbage really. I desperately need something to translate Japanese into my ear, and I'm probably just good enough to relay my point back without the other party needing an eng->jp version, so I would be a prime customer for this gadget. But the technological accuracy…

The japanese version will be pretty terrible, I'd imagine. Too much homophones and ambiguous wording. "sounandayo!" = そうなんだよ "that's right!" = 遭難だよ "it's an accident!"

The pitch on those are quite different and there is obviously context to rely on too. I mean whether the software can do all that is a question, but something like Siri does OK with Japanese speech recognition (at least not a lot worse than other languages from what I can tell).

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#53
post #50
post #40

I have a bad enough time getting Siri to understand my Aussie accent. Throw in something as inaccurate as Google Translate and you'll have... A pile of garbage really. I desperately need something to translate Japanese into my ear, and I'm probably just good enough to relay my point back without the other party needing an eng->jp version, so I would be a prime customer for this gadget. But the technological accuracy…

I'm from Scotland, and on the rare occassions time I need to phone a US voice activated phone line (e.g. Expedia.com's), I have to put on a ridiculous American accent for the system to understand me. This is a hard problem.

Obligatory link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMS2VnDveP8

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#54
This seems like a scam, or at best a marketing lie. Voice recognition is still an experimental field that's very difficult to get right. Even today's professional voice recognition software requires some voice training. There's no way this thing can accurately pick up speech in a random environment.

And given that most voice recognition software require some decent hardware (think your phone or your pc). I doubt it's gonna fit into that tiny earpiece with today's hardware specs.

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#55

"The creator says he came up with the idea when he met a French girl." and just like that he came up with the whole concept of real time language translation, something the world has never even considered before /snark

Well, it might be that the beautiful British girl at that Islington flat-party was busy talking to an alien herself.

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#56
post #40

I have a bad enough time getting Siri to understand my Aussie accent. Throw in something as inaccurate as Google Translate and you'll have... A pile of garbage really. I desperately need something to translate Japanese into my ear, and I'm probably just good enough to relay my point back without the other party needing an eng->jp version, so I would be a prime customer for this gadget. But the technological accuracy…

I live in Montreal and my biggest gripe with Siri is her not being bilingual! There are so many street names or place names here that are French and when I want to send a message to a francophone friend I can only use handsfree mode in English.

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#57
post #37

I'm skeptical we'll be seeing this device. I guess it'll mainly depend if they'd get funded and even then I only see this as a short lived gimmick. The machine translation software just isn't good enough. It's unmissable to me, but for real time translation, it's simply not there yet. Since they have to license the speech recognition and machine translation technologies, in the end they'll just be competing with blue…

Agree. What does the earplug device offer that regular bluetooth headsets don't. The actual translation is happening in the phone or cloud anyway.

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#59
post #45

Sorry to sound so negative, but it seems something halfway between an April Fool and some Kickstarter "scam" (possibly in good conscience, but still). Both voice recognition and translation are HARD problems, for which even companies with tons of resources and talent like Apple and Google were able to provide only sketchy and partial solutions. No to mention issues like battery life, connectivity (hard to believe thi…

Meanwhile, Bragi's wireless headphones have a microphone for pass-thru audio, and bluetooth connectivity. Coupled with a smartphone, I'm curious why an app for this doesn't already exist?

Re: In-Ear Device That Translates Foreign Languages in Real Time

#60
post #45

Sorry to sound so negative, but it seems something halfway between an April Fool and some Kickstarter "scam" (possibly in good conscience, but still). Both voice recognition and translation are HARD problems, for which even companies with tons of resources and talent like Apple and Google were able to provide only sketchy and partial solutions. No to mention issues like battery life, connectivity (hard to believe thi…

Jibbigo was doing decent voice-to-voice translation entirely locally back in the iPhone 3GS days. You still had all the usual pitfalls of voice recognition and machine translation, but it was good enough to be useful.

Your FAQ link isn't loading for me (hugged to death?) but I watched the video on the page HN links to here and I see nothing in it that's infeasible. As with any voice recognition and machine translation product, you'll probably need to be patient and tolerant of many errors, and I wouldn't be surprised if they gloss over that, but it could still be useful.

Edit: the FAQ finally loaded. I don't see anything particularly remarkable in there. There are no promises for battery life, speed, or accuracy. The basic premise of offline voice-to-voice translation is totally doable and has been done.

Post reply on HN